Original investigation: pathogenesis and treatment of kidney disease and hypertension
Effect of N-acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathy in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency: a randomized trial

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2004.01.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: The effect of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) to prevent contrast nephropathy (CN) in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography or interventions is not clear. Methods: This is a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Ninety-one consecutive patients with a serum creatinine level of 1.69 to 4.52 mg/dL (149 to 400 μmol/L) undergoing coronary procedures were recruited and randomly assigned to administration of either oral NAC, 400 mg, thrice daily the day before and day of the contrast procedure (the NAC group) or no drug (the control group). Serum creatinine was measured before and 48 hours after contrast exposure. The primary end point of this study was the development of CN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine concentration of 0.5 mg/dL or greater (≥44 μmol/L) or a reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 25% or greater of the baseline value 48 hours after the procedure. Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (46 patients, NAC group; 45 patients, control group) in baseline characteristics or mean volume of contrast agent administered. Six patients (13.3%) in the control group and 8 patients (17.4%) in the NAC group developed CN (P = 0.8). Serum creatinine levels increased from 2.27 ± 0.54 to 2.45 ± 0.65 mg/dL (201 ± 48 to 217 ± 57 μmol/L; P = 0.003) in the NAC group and 2.37 ± 0.61 to 2.40 ± 0.70 mg/dL (210 ± 54 to 212 ± 62 μmol/L; P = 0.6) in the control group. The increase in serum creatinine levels between the 2 groups had no difference (P = 0.7). Estimated GFR decreased from 30.3 ± 8.4 to 28.1 ± 8.4 mL/min (P = 0.01) in the NAC group and 28.4 ± 8.6 to 27.5 ± 8.8 mL/min (P = 0.3) in the control group. The decline in estimated GFR between the 2 groups had no difference (P = 0.7). Conclusion: In the current study, oral NAC had no effect on the prevention of CN in patents with moderate to severe renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography or interventions. However, the sample size of our present study is small. Our findings highlight the need for a large-scale, randomized, controlled trial to determine the exact beneficial effect of NAC.

Section snippets

Methods

We enrolled consecutive patients with a serum creatinine level of 1.69 to 4.52 mg/dL (149 to 400 μmol/L) who underwent elective coronary angiography or intervention. The indication for angiography was determined by individual cardiologists. All patients had 2 serum creatinine measurements within 1 month before coronary angiography, with intraindividual fluctuation less than 15% to confirm stable renal function before recruitment. Patients with a known allergy to NAC or contrast agents were

Results

There were 46 patients enrolled in the NAC group, and 45 patients, in the control group. Baseline clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The NAC group had marginally more patients who had hypertensive nephrosclerosis, were administered aspirin, had renal artery stenosis, had a greater dose of contrast administered, and had a greater estimated GFR at baseline and fewer patients who were administered angiotensin receptor antagonist than the control group, although none of the

Discussion

In this randomized study, there was no difference in incidence of CN between NAC with hydration and hydration alone in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography or interventions. Moreover, there also was no difference in changes in serum creatinine levels or estimated GFRs between the 2 arms. In logistic regression analysis, none of the potential variables, including treatment strategy, predicted the primary end point. Although it has been suggested

References (48)

  • R. Birck et al.

    Acetylcysteine for prevention of contrast nephropathyMeta-analysis

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • L.S. Weisberg et al.

    Radiocontrast-induced nephropathy in humansRole of renal vasoconstriction

    Kidney Int

    (1992)
  • S.H. Hou et al.

    Hospital acquired renal insufficiencyA prospective study

    Am J Med

    (1983)
  • M.A. Stevens et al.

    A prospective randomized trial of prevention measures in patients at high risk for contrast nephropathy: Results of the PRINCE Study. Prevention of Radiocontrast Induced Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1999)
  • B.J. Barrett et al.

    Prevention of nephrotoxicity induced by radiocontrast agents

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • G.M. Chertow et al.

    Prognostic stratification in critically ill patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis

    Arch Intern Med

    (1995)
  • L. Gruberg et al.

    Acute renal failure requiring dialysis after percutaneous coronary interventions

    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

    (2001)
  • S.W. Murphy et al.

    Contrast nephropathy

    J Am Soc Nephrol

    (2000)
  • S.S. Hans et al.

    Effect of dopamine on renal function after arteriography in patients with preexisting renal insufficiency

    Am Surg

    (1998)
  • P.A. McCullough et al.

    Prediction and prevention of contrast nephropathy

    J Interv Cardiol

    (2001)
  • R. Solomon et al.

    Effects of saline, mannitol, and furosemide on acute decreases in renal function induced by radiocontrast agents

    N Engl J Med

    (1994)
  • M. Brezis et al.

    Hypoxia of the renal medulla—Its implications for disease

    N Engl J Med

    (1995)
  • G. Porter

    Contrast associated nephropathyPresentation, pathophysiology and management

    Miner Electrolyte Metab

    (1994)
  • G.L. Bakris et al.

    Radiocontrast medium-induced declines in renal functionA role for oxygen radicals

    Am J Physiol

    (1990)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Contrast induced nephropathy in vascular surgery

      2016, British Journal of Anaesthesia
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text