Circulating Microemboli after Composite Replacement or Valve-sparing Aortic Root Surgery

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine whether microembolic signals (MES) occur after valve-sparing operations on the aortic root. One of the advantages of these procedures relates to the freedom of macroemboli without anticoagulation. Whether this holds true for circulating microemboli has not yet been verified. Methods: For comparison, 8 male patients (mean age: 51.8 ± 12.8 years) were investigated 20.5 ± 8.4 months after implantation of a mechanical composite graft (group I) and 9 female and 7 male patients (mean age 55.0 ± 13.4 years) 23.5 ± 20.0 months after valve-sparing replacement of the aortic root (group II). The middle cerebral artery was insonated for 2 periods of 30 min, breathing room air or O₂ at 9 l/min. Results: Breathing room air, the amount of MES was considerably smaller in group II (0.94 ± 1.95 vs. 56.1 ± 58.9 per 30 min, p = 0.006). The difference was less pronounced (0.5 ± 1.3 vs. 28.9 ± 42.6 per 30 min, p = 0.009) breathing oxygen. Breathing oxygen reduced MES significantly in group I (p < 0.05) but not in group II (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Aortic valve-sparing operations induce MES at a significantly lower rate than composite aortic valve replacement using a mechanical valve.

References

• 1 Kouchoukos N T, Wareing T H, Murphy S F, Perillo J B. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement: results of 172 operations.  Ann Surg. 1991;  214 308-320
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Yacoub M, Fayan A, Stassano P, Radley-Smith R. Results of valve conserving operations for aortic regurgitation.  Circulation. 1983;  68 (III) 321
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sarsam M A, Yacoub M. Remodeling of the aortic valve anulus.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;  105 435-438
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 David T E, Feindel C M. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  103 617-622
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Leyh R G, Schmidtke C, Sievers H H, Yacoub M H. Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after different types of valve-preserving surgery.  Circulation. 1999;  100 2153-2160
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Babikian V L, Hyde C, Pochay V, Winter M R. Clinical correlates of high-intensity transient signals detected on transcranial Doppler sonography in patients with cerebrovascular disease.  Stroke. 1994;  25 1570-1573
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Georgiadis D, Grosset D G, Kelman A, Fainchey A, Lees K R. Prevalence and characteristics of intracranial microemboli signals in patients with different types of prosthetic cardiac valves.  Stroke. 1994;  25 585-592
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rams J J, Davis A D, Lolley D M, Berger M P, Spencer M. Detection of microemboli in patients with artificial heart valves using transcranial Doppler monitoring: preliminary observations.  J Heart Valve Dis. 1993;  2 37 41
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 van Zuilen E V, Moll F L, Vermeulen F E, van Gijn J, Ackerstaff R G. Detection of cerebral microemboli by means of transcranial Doppler monitoring before and after carotid endarterectomy.  Stroke. 1995;  26 210-213
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Siebler M, Sitzer M, Steinmetz H. Detection of intracranial emboli in patients with symptomatic extracranial carotid artery disease.  Stroke. 1992;  23 1652-1654
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Braekken S K, Russell D, Brucher R, Svenevig J. Incicence and frequency of cerebral embolic signals in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves.  Stroke. 1995;  26 1225-1230
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Georgiadis D, Mallinson A, Grosset D G, Lees K R. Coagulation activity and emboli counts in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves.  Stroke. 1994;  25 1211-1214
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Shu M CS, Gross J M, Johnson K M. Can cavitation bubbles generated by mechanical heart valves be detected by transcranial Doppler?.  J Heart Valve Dis<. 1995;  4 542-552
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kaps M, Hansen J, Weiher M, Tiffert K, Kayser I, Droste D W. Clinically silent microemboli in patients with artificial prosthetic aortic valves are predominantly gaseous and not solid.  Stroke. 1997;  28 322-326
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Georgiadis D, Baumgartner R W, Karatschai R, Lindner A, Zerkowski H R. Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  115 808-810
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Droste D W, Markus H S, Brown N M. The effect of different settings of ultrasound pulse amplitude, gain and sample volume on the appearance of emboli studied in a transcranial Doppler model.  Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;  4 152-154
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Marascuilo L A, McSweeney M. Nonparametric and distribution-free methods for the social sciences. Monterey, California; Brooks/ Cole Publishing Company 1997: 333-334
  Google Scholar
• 18 Nötzold A, Droste D W, Hagedorn G. et al . Circulating microemboli in patients after aortic valve replacement with pulmonary autografts and mechanical valve prostheses.  Circulation. 1997;  96 1843-1846
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Garrison L A, Lamson T C, Deutsch S, Geselowitz D B, Gaumond J M, Tarbell J M. An in-vitro investigation of prosthetic heart valve cavitation in blood.  J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;  3 S8-S24
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Yacoub M H, Gehle P, Chandrasekaran V, Birks E J. Child A, Radley-Smith R. Late results of a valve preserving operation in patients with aneurysms of the ascending aorta and root.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  115 (I) 1080-1090
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. Hans Hinrichs Sievers

Klinik für Herzchirurgie Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck

Ratzeburger Allee 160

23538 Lübeck

Germany

Phone: +49 (451) 500-2108

Fax: +49 (451) 500-2051

Email: noetzold@medinf.mu-luebeck.de