Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 33(4): 218-220
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1014123
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Pacemaker Infections - Treatment with Total or Partial Pacemaker System Removal*

A. Harjula1 , A. Järvinen1 , K. S. Virtanen2 , S. Mattila1
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Laboratory, and
  • 2First Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
*Supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Helsinki, Finland
Further Information

Publication History

1985

Publication Date:
19 March 2008 (online)

  PDF Download  Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Summary

During the years 1977 to 1983, 1,458 pacemakers were implanted or reimplanted in our clinic. Seventy-nine patients were treated during the same period for pacemaker System infections. The time interval between the preceding surgical maneuver and the manifest infection was 11.9 ± 10.2 months in the catheter fistulas and 12.2 ± 11.5 months in the pacemaker pocket infections. Forty-one of 79 infections (52%) occurred following the first generator implantation. In 33/43 (76.7%) patients with partial pacemaker System removal, recurrent infection occurred 19.6 ± 17.2 months later. The infection was treated with similar surgical maneuvers resulting in subsequent infections in 9 patients after 9.8 ± 7.2 months. In the patients with total pacemaker System removal infection developed in 2/25 (8%). The infection resulted in septicemia in 9 patients. Major surgical Intervention was necessary for removal of the infected endocardial electrode in 7 patients.

According to our experience there are no grounds for partial removal of the pacemaker System if infection occurs. The primary results may be satisfactory but reinfection will appear in the majority of the patients after a period of several months.

Key words

Pacemaker - Infection

      >