It has been suggested biatrial pacing may prevent the recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). To further evaluate this hypothesis, we performed a randomized, single-blinded study in 19 patients with drug refractory AF. The study compared biatrial pacing with conventional right atrial (RA) pacing and a control period of inhibited pacing. The pacing modes utilized were DDD with a base rate of 70 beats/min for biatrial and RA pace (with and without biatrial resynchronization, respectively) and 40 beats/min for the control period. The duration of each pacing mode was 3 months. The number of AF episodes and their duration were obtained from pacemaker Holter memory (Chorus RM ELA Medical). Comparison of the control period (n = 11) with either pacing strategy showed a significant decrease in the total duration of AF (control 27 +/- 35 days, biatrial 8 +/- 15 days p = 0.02, RA 11 +/- 27 days p = 0.04). However, there was no effect on the number of AF episodes (control 79 +/- 108, biatrial 36 +/- 75 p = 0.32, RA 41 +/- 80 p = 0.11). The total percentage of atrial pacing also significantly increased when the control period (6 +/- 9%) was compared with both RA pace (62 +/- 33%, p = 0.008) and biatrial pace (63 +/- 31, p = 0.003). When biatrial pacing was compared with RA pace (n = 19), there was no significant difference in either the duration of AF (biatrial 16 +/- 26 days vs RA 19 +/- 31 days, p = 0.7) or the number of AF episodes (biatrial 56 +/- 91 vs RA 87 +/- 106, p = 0.34). In conclusion, pacing (either type) at a base rate of 70 beats/min has an antifibrillatory effect when compared with inhibited pacing at 40 beats/min. No additional benefit of biatrial pacing over right atrial pacing was demonstrated in this study.