Prediction of infarct coronary artery recanalization after intravenous thrombolytic therapy

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Mar 1;59(6):513-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91158-1.

Abstract

Clinical assessment of patients with evolving acute myocardial infarction may suggest recanalization of the infarct coronary artery if chest pain, electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation and reperfusion arrhythmia are diminished. These 3 criteria, however, have not been correlated with immediate coronary angiography. Determination of which patients will achieve myocardial reperfusion after intravenous fibrinolytic therapy would allow for appropriate triage; those in whom it fails may be considered for mechanical or surgical recanalization. Fifty-six patients were studied: 28 received intravenous streptokinase and 28 intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. None of these clinical criteria, considered separately, was predictive of infarct artery recanalization status. Using the presence or absence of all 3 criteria, the specificity and predictive value increased to 100%. However, only 9% of patients in the series had all 3 criteria present (all had a patent infarct artery) and 34% had no criteria present (all had an occluded vessel). Noninvasive clinical markers are simple and practical, but only concordance of all 3 major criteria, when present, accurately predicts results of thrombolytic therapy.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Chest Pain / diagnosis
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis
  • Myocardial Infarction / drug therapy*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Streptokinase / administration & dosage
  • Streptokinase / therapeutic use*

Substances

  • Streptokinase