Article Text

Download PDFPDF
An unusual cause of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
  1. Rebecca D Levit1,
  2. Marek Polomsky2,
  3. J David Vega2,
  4. David R Martin3,
  5. Gautam Kumar1,4
  1. 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  2. 2Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  3. 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  4. 4Division of Cardiology, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, Georgia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gautam Kumar, Cardiology Division (111C/D), Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1670 Clairmont Road, Decatur, GA 30033, USA; gautam.kumar{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical introduction

A 66-year-old man presented with dull, left-sided chest pain for 1 week occurring mainly at rest. The symptoms had been present for 1 month but had increased in frequency over the preceding 3 days. He became acutely short of breath with substernal chest pain while climbing a flight of stairs the day of admission. The pain was pressure-like, did not radiate and was associated with presyncope, but not syncope, diaphoresis, nausea nor vomiting. He had no past medical history of cardiac disease but did have risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) including hypertension, history of smoking and the metabolic syndrome. His past medical history was also significant for non-Hodgkin's stage IV …

View Full Text


  • Contributors All authors had a highly significant contribution to this work. RDL drafted the article and collected images. MP, JDV and DRM collected additional surgical and pathological images and contributed significantly to manuscript revisions. GK conceptualised the format, contributed significantly to revisions and obtained clinical images.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles