Statistics from Altmetric.com
Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure represents a complementary option and effective treatment for patients at risk of thromboembolism, especially in patients for whom it may be difficult to achieve satisfactory anticoagulation control or where anticoagulation treatment is not possible or desirable.
Effective and safe transcatheter LAA occlusion requires a detailed knowledge of crucial anatomic landmarks and endocardial morphologic variants of the LAA and its neighbouring structures.1 ,2 w1–w3 Our aim in this article is to provide the basic anatomic information that is important for the interventional cardiologist to know when planning an LAA occlusion procedure.
The right atrium (RA) forms the rightward and anterior part of the cardiac mass. This overlaps the right band margin of the left atrium (LA). The leftward margin of the RA is marked posteriorly by the interatrial groove, which lies between the superior caval vein and the right pulmonary veins. Owing to the obliquity of the interatrial septum (IAS) plane (approximately 65° from the sagittal plane), and to the different levels of the mitral and tricuspid valve orifices, the left atrium is turned and situated posterior and superior to the right atrium. Only the tip of the LAA contributes to the left cardiac silhouette in a frontal fluoroscopic view of the body (figure 1).
From a gross anatomical viewpoint, both atria have a venous component, a vestibule, and an appendage, and share the IAS.1 w1 In reality, both atria also possess a body. This is best seen in the LA, and represents the smooth walled component interposed between the vestibule and the venous component. The body of RA is much smaller, and represents the space between the left venous valve, when this structure can be recognised, and the IAS. The venous component of the RA is located posterolaterally and receives the systemic venous return from the superior vena cava, the inferior vena cava, and the coronary venous return from the coronary sinus (figure 1). The venous component located posterosuperiorly is the major part of the LA and receives the pulmonary veins (PVs) at the four corners, enclosing a prominent atrial dome (figure 1). A common ending for the left superior and inferior PVs can be seen in about a quarter of hearts. The vestibule on both atria represents the smooth muscular wall around the atrioventricular (AV) valve orifices that supports the leaflets of the tricuspid or mitral valves (figure 2). The posterior portion of the LA vestibular component directly apposes the wall of the coronary sinus. Just proximal to the vestibular component, the left atrial wall usually is smooth and, unlike the RA, is without an array of pectinate muscles.
The walls of the LA are non-uniform in thickness and in general appear thicker than the RA (figures 3, 4). The walls can be described as being anterior, superior, left lateral, septal, and posterior. The anterior wall is located behind the ascending aorta and the transverse pericardial sinus (figure 3). Part of the anterior wall immediately inferior to the Bachmann bundle and posterior to the aorta can be very thin (1–2 mm).3 The roof of the superior wall is relatively thick and is in close proximity to the right pulmonary artery. The posterior wall can be the thickest (6.5±2.5 mm) part of the LA but it becomes thinner at the veno-atrial junctions (2.2±0.3 mm)w4 (figure 3) (box 1).
Anatomic and imaging determinant for LAA occlusion
Dimensions of the LA: for all devices
Myocardial thickness: anterior wall and venoatrial junctions may be very thin
Distance from the OF to the LAA ostium: for all devices
Accessory LAA: mainly anterior wall and mitral isthmus
Webs and septa
Interatrial septum: should be a low posterior transseptal puncture. OF dimensions, rim thickness, proximity to the aortic root, PFO, patches, occluder devices, and septal aneurysm
Left atrial appendage
Morphological variants: LAA apex directed behind the pulmonary trunk (exclusion criteria for LARIAT)
Ostial diameters/circumference: 17–31 mm (Watchman) and 12.6–28.5 mm (ACP)
LAA length: LAA width >40 mm (LARIAT), should exceed the maximal ostial diameter (Watchman)
LAA angulation: for all devices, less able to be angled a special concern for the Watchman
Maximal length of dominant lobe: for all devices
Multilobular LAA: multilobed LAA oriented in different planes >40 mm (exclusion criteria for LARIAT)
Distance from the ostium to the first bend of the LAA: landing zone that exceeds the maximal ostial diameter for the Watchman, landing zone ≥10 mm for the ACP
Trabeculations (pectinate muscle): should not be mistaken for thrombus
Myocardial thickness: thinner posterior wall and risk of cardiac perforation for all devices
Extra-appendicular trabeculations: risk of cardiac perforation and periprosthetic leaks
Ostial diameters of LSPV
Relation LSPV and LAA orifices: usually at the same level
Lateral ridge orientation and width: poor definition of the orifice limits in ellipsoid LAA
Thrombus: contraindication for ablation
Left circumflex artery: risk for artery compression between the anchoring lobe and the disc for the ACP
Left SAN artery
Great cardiac vein and obtuse marginal vein
Persistent left superior vena cava
Post-CABG venous grafts
Pericardial adhesions: of special concern for the LARIAT
Left phrenic nerve: of special concern for the LARIAT
ACP, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; LA, left atrium; LAA, left atrial appendage; LSPV, left superior pulmonary vein; OF, oval fossa; PFO, patent foramen ovale; SAN, sinoatrial node.
Lateral ridge of the LA
The left lateral ridge (LLR) between the orifices of the left PVs and the ostium of the LAA is the most relevant structural prominence on the endocardial side of the LA and therefore an important anatomic determinant during the LAA occlusion procedure. This structure is actually an infolding of the lateral atrial wall protruding into the endocardial LA surface as a prominent crest or ridge.4 A 3D study using MRI showed that the ridge was narrower than 5 mm in the majority of patients.5 Our anatomical study demonstrated that the LLR has a narrower width and thicker myocardium superiorly rather than inferiorly.4 The spatial relationship between the orifices of the LAA and the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) is also of relevance. Anatomical studies using multidetector CT5 ,6 have shown that in most patients (58–64%) the LAA and LSPV orifices are at the same level. The LAA orifice is shown to be located superior to the LSPV ostium in 22–30% of cases and inferior to it in 12–13%5 (figure 5) (box 1).
IAS and transseptal puncture
It is essential to understand the detailed anatomy of the IAS in order to perform a safe transseptal approach to the LAA. The PLATOO device was the first percutaneous LAA occluder to be introduced in 2002. Despite good preliminary results, the development programme was suspended and the device has been removed from the market. Currently, the two devices most frequently used worldwide are the Watchman system (Boston Scientific Natick, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) (St Jude Medical Inc, Minnesota, USA). Both prostheses are implanted at the LAA ostium via the transseptal pathway using the femoral vein access. A newly introduced device is LARIAT (Sentre HEART Inc, Redwood City, California, USA), which employs delivery of an epicardial suture to snare and ligate the LAA after percutaneous pericardial and transseptal access.w5
The true IAS is the oval fossa, which is seen as a relatively central depression in the right atrial aspect of the septum. The floor of the oval fossa is formed by the embryonic septum primum which, in most individuals, completely adheres to the periphery (rim or limbus) of the oval fossa1 (figures 2 and 3). On the left atrial side of the IAS, the floor of the oval fossa is usually indistinguishable from the rest of the atrial wall, except for a small crescent-like edge that marks the free margin of the septum primum.1 The rim of the oval fossa at the anterosuperior and posteroinferior margins is formed by the infolded muscular right atrial wall and is not considered a true septum. This atrial muscular fold is filled with epicardial fibro-fatty tissue and termed the ‘interatrial groove’ (also known to cardiac surgeons as the Waterston groove).w1 The anteroinferior rim, which anchors the flap valve, is also a septal structure which continues into the atrial vestibules on both sides of the septal component and into the Eustachian ridge (sinus septum) on the right atrial side. The anteroinferior rim is continuous with the Eustachian ridge (sinus septum) and the atrial vestibule (figure 2). The anteroinferior rim is separated from ventricles by the fat-filled inferior pyramidal space, through which the AV nodal artery passes.1
The IAS has an oblique course from a left anterior to a right posterior position. The angle in relation to the sagittal plane varies with the size of the atrial chambers and the orientation of the heart. Fluoroscopic angulations used for transseptal punctures must be individualised because of the variability in the position of the heart in the thorax. In the left anterior oblique projection, the interatrial groove is almost perpendicular to the plane of the image intensifier. It is important to remember that all transseptal punctures to access the LA should be performed through the oval fossa. It is the thin floor of the oval fossa (approximately 1–3 mm in thickness) in normal hearts that allows direct access between the atrial chambers (figures 2⇑–4).w1 It comprises a bilaminar arrangement of myocytes with variable amounts of fibrous tissue.w1
The location and size of the oval fossa varies from case to case, as does the profile or prominence of the muscular rim. To minimise the risk of cardiac perforation during LAA occlusion, a low posterior transseptal puncture should be performed to facilitate a frontal approach to the LAA orifice (box 1). Since the anterosuperior rim of the IAS is closely related to the aortic root (figure 1), an accidental puncture in this region and entrance into the transverse pericardial sinus may result in haemopericardium, especially in highly anticoagulated patients.
Precise evaluation of the size of the oval fossa and morphology of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) are crucial at the time of the procedure. In PFO the anterosuperior aspect of the rim is not sealed. Transcatheter LAA closure needs an access that is more inferior, therefore in these cases a lower transseptal puncture should be performed. Other relevant anatomic variants include aneurysm of the IAS, atrial septal defect, and lipomatous hypertrophy of the septum. The latter is characterised by increased deposition of fat in the interatrial groove (not within the true septum) and may result in a thickened rim, especially in its anterosuperior and inferior rims, and consequently constriction of the oval fossa. Transatrial access to the LA can be challenging in interatrial communications with patches or occluder devices, and in the presence of an IAS aneurysm or thickened fibrotic septum due to previous transseptal interventions. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) or intracardiac echocardiography remain the imaging methods of choice to facilitate the transseptal approach2 w2 w3 (figure 4). Anatomical detail can also be clearly evaluated by preprocedure CT angiography of the heart.
Morphological variants of the LAA
The LAA is seen on the left border between the left ventricle and the pulmonary outflow tract. The tip of the LAA can be in a variety of positions, lying over the pulmonary trunk and the left anterior descending coronary artery, pointing posteriorly, or even directed medially towards the back of the aortaw6 (figure 6). The LAA tends to have a tubular shape with one or several bends resembling little fingers. A relevant anatomic study in 500 postmortem specimens established that the LAA is multilobed in 80% (two or more lobes) of cases.7 In this study7 a lobe was anatomically defined as: (1) a visible ‘outpouching’ from the main tubular LAA, often demarcated externally by a ‘crease’; (2) able to accept a 2 mm probe internally; (3) possibly associated with a change in the main tubular LAA direction; and (4) lying in a different plane from the main tubular LAA. In a recent autopsy study, two and three lobes were observed in 64.3% and 35.7% of specimens, respectively.8 Accurate sizing of the LAA and knowledge of its gross morphological features are crucial to reduce the frequency of complications associated with percutaneous LAA occlusion (box 1). Using the LARIAT device and based on LAA anatomy, exclusion criteria included: (a) LAA width <40 mm; (b) a superiorly oriented LAA with the LAA apex directed behind the pulmonary trunk; (c) a bilobed LAA or multilobed LAA in which lobes were oriented in different planes exceeding 40 mm; and (d) a posteriorly rotated heart.w5
Comprehensive imaging of the entire LAA is important in order to evaluate the LAA morphological variants and diagnose an intraluminal thrombus. The LAA is the major source of cardiac thrombi in atrial fibrillation (AF) and plays a major role in cardioembolic events.w4 w6 CT and MRI can be used to assess the LAA morphology and thrombus (figures 7, 8). However, TOE remains the imaging method of choice to exclude LAA thrombus. The main echocardiographic exclusion criterion for percutaneous LAA occlusion is the presence of thrombus in the LAA, although the presence of spontaneous echo contrast and significant valve disease should be noted.w2 w7 In a recent study, Di Biase et al9 analysed gross morphology of the LAA in patients with AF using CT and MRI. The LAA morphologies were classified as cactus (30%), chicken wing (48%), windsock (19%), and cauliflower (3%). The study showed that patients with chicken wing LAA morphology were less likely to have an embolic event.
Left atrial contour abnormalities such as cauliflower-like accessory LAAs have been increasingly recognised with the improved spatial resolution of modern non-invasive imaging modalities10 (figure 7). These outpouchings of the LA have been reported in 10–15% of the adult population and are usually seen in two anatomic locations: the anterior wall of the LA (projecting into the transverse sinus); and the left atrial isthmus. These accessory atrial appendages may be the source of unexplained embolic stroke or interfere with interventional procedures.10
Ostium of the LAA
In autopsy specimens and imaging studies, the LAA ostium is usually elliptical or round and in elliptical-shaped variant, its long axis is obliquely orientated relative to the mitral annulus.8 ,11 The mean longest diameter of the LAA orifice is 16–17 mm and the mean shortest diameter is around 10–11 mm.8 ,11 Wang et al6 performed a cardiac CT study in patients with or without AF and classified the orifice into five types: oval (68.9%), foot-like (10%), triangular (7.7%), water drop-like (7.7%), and round (5.7%). A real-time 3D TOE study demonstrated a progressive increase in LAA orifice, becoming more round-shaped with increasing frequency of AF.12 Attention should be given to these variations in shape of the LAA orifice before percutaneous occlusion device placement is undertaken (figure 9) (box 1).
Pre-procedural assessment of the ostial dimensions of the LAA is crucial for correct sizing and safe placement of the device required. The principal difference between the two occlusive devices is their shape. The Watchman system is implanted at 10 mm from the ostium of the LAA, and therefore does not cover it. The ACP contains a distal anchoring lobe that is implanted 10–15 mm from the ostium and a proximal disc that covers the entrance to the LAA. The maximal cross-sectional diameter of the LAA orifice recommended for device implantation ranges from 17–31.9 mm for the Watchman and 12.6–28.5 mm for the ACP device. With the ACP device, care should be taken to size the landing zone of the anchoring lobe, since the device cannot be used if this area is <10 mm in width13 (figure 10). In addition, the distal lobe should be 1.5–3.4 mm larger than the diameter. For the Watchmann device, an important anatomic determinant is that the LAA length should exceed the maximal ostial diameter to ensure a landing zone. Stöllberger et al14 compared TOE measurements of the LAA with postmortem casts and demonstrated that the LAA size and orifice can be assessed reliably by echocardiography, especially in the horizontal plane.
Accurate measurement of the LAA ostial diameters and circumference is critically important for successful device ostial closure; 2D TOE significantly underestimates LAA dimension and orifice size as compared with 3D TOE15 (figure 11). Some groups use only intracardiac echocardiography, or even angiographic control, to guide the procedure. CT can also provide precious information. It should be noted that the dimensional axes obtained by different imaging techniques may not be the same. Discrepancies found in ostial measurements between different imaging techniques are more frequent in the LAA with ellipsoid morphology due to the proximity of the posterosuperior rim of the ostium with the LLR, causing a poor definition of the orifice limits. CT may facilitate the implantation strategy and selection of the appropriate device occluder size in these cases. Additional information that can be best obtained with CT or 3D TOE includes spatial relationship and orientation of the LAA with surrounding structures.w7–10
Pectinate muscles of the LAA
A complicated network of fine pectinate muscles lines the endocardial surface of the LAA (figure 12). The pectinate muscles have been thicker than 1 mm in most of our autopsy hearts (95–97%). Pectinate muscles <1 mm in size have been noted only in the specimens from the first or last decade of life.7 Between the muscle bundles, the LAA wall can be paper-thin (figure 12). When investigating the LAA by TOE or contrast enhanced CT, the pectinate muscles should not be mistaken for thrombus. In a recent study, Anselmino et al16 correlated the LAA morphology and the amount of trabeculations as detected by CT with the burden of silent cerebral ischaemia as a new thromboembolic risk marker in AF patients. They observed mild trabeculations in LAAs with a chicken wing morphology, moderate trabeculations in cases with a cactus morphology, and extensive trabeculations in LAAs with a cauliflower morphology. Although cauliflower morphology with extensive trabeculations was the uncommon type in their series (5.2%), they were more likely to have a silent cerebral ischaemia.
In some specimens (28%), muscular trabeculations can be found extending inferiorly from the appendage to the vestibule of the mitral valve.4 These extra-appendicular myocardial bands correspond to the small set of posterior pectinate muscles originating from the myocardial bundles to embrace the LAA (figure 12). In those hearts with extra-appendicular posterior pectinate muscles, the areas between the muscular trabeculae and the atrial wall become exceptionally thin (0.5±0.2 mm),4 increasing the risk of cardiac perforation during transcatheter closure devices. Large muscular extra-appendicular trabeculations in the area close to the ostium of the LAA may also facilitate periprosthetic leaks after the device implantation. Postmortem and explanted heart studies from patients with AF showed larger volumes (three times) and orifices of the LAA than those from patients in sinus rhythm. Furthermore, in most patients (73%) with chronic AF, the LAA showed significant endocardial thickening with fibrous and elastic tissue (endocardial fibroelastosis) compared to those without AF.17 Such features may contribute to the increased risk of thrombus formation and systemic embolism (figures 8, 13). Additionally, the information may have relevance in interpreting TOE images of the LAA in patients with chronic AF.9
Muscular architecture of the LAA
Structurally, the LAA has a very fine and a non-uniform myocardial wall thickness.3 As can be seen in figure 14, the posterior wall of the LAA shows a notably thinner myocardial content (<1 mm). Detailed transmural dissections of the LA wall and LAA have shown a complex architecture of overlapping cardiomyocytes, with different orientations giving the false impression of layers, as these are not separated by sheaths of insulating fibrous tissue. There are individual variations from heart to heart, but in general the myoarchitecture conforms to the pattern first shown so elegantly in human hearts by Papez in 1920.18 From the epicardial aspect, it is common to find a broad muscular bundle that runs along the anterior atrial wall known as the Bachmann or interatrial bundle. This bundle is composed of myocytes that are aligned in parallel fashion relative to the plane of the AV junction, and extends from the right superior cavoatrial junction towards the lateral wall of the left atrium.w11 The leftward extension of the Bachmann bundle bifurcates around the neck of the LAA (figure 14), and then reunites to form a broad band that runs circumferentially around the vestibular wall of the posterior surface of the LA to enter the posterior septal raphe.
Another important bundle described by Papez18 is the septopulmonary bundle, which is composed of longitudinally to obliquely arranged myocytes. The myocytes of this bundle fan out around the insertions of the pulmonary veins to join the venous muscular sleeves.w10 The bundle also extends to fuse with the myocytes arriving from the roof and anterior wall of the LAA. The septopulmonary bundle also forms part of the subepicardial myocytes at the LLR. Deeper than the septopulmonary bundle is the septoatrial bundle18 which forms the subendocardium. It arises from the anterior and inferior parts of the IAS, and divides into three bands. The first band fans out towards the orifices of the right PVs and combines with the oblique myocytes from the anterior vestibule. The second band combines with leftward myocytes of the septopulmonary bundle at the orifices of the left PVs to form muscular loops around the venoatrial junctions. Some myocytes of the third band run leftward and anteriorly around the opening of the LAA, while other myocytes continue into the fine trabeculations of the pectinate muscles lining the cavity of the appendage (figure 14). The last two bands contribute to the deep myocytes of the LLR.w11
Anatomic relationships of the LAA
The LAA ostium is situated above the left AV groove which contains the left circumflex artery and the great cardiac vein together with their branches.w1 The distance of the LAA ostium from the AV groove is variable, but in some cases close approximation of the left circumflex artery (LCx) to the ostium can make it vulnerable to injury during implantation of occluder devices, especially when devices are sized to be larger than the ostium. The lower end of the anchoring lobe is usually just distal to the artery and attention should be paid to avoid compression of the LCx between the lobe and the disc during ACP implantation. The potential for LCx injury is also present when occlusion is performed by an epicardial approach using snare devices (box 1). In patients after coronary artery bypass surgery, the anatomic passage of the venous graft targeted at obtuse marginal or diagonal branches can be very close to the tip of the appendage, making it vulnerable to injury in the percutaneous epicardial approach (figure 15).
It is well established that the sinoatrial node (SAN) artery can originate from the left coronary system in 30–40% of patients. In postmortem dissection and angiographic studies the left SAN artery was seen to arise from the LCx in 30% of the cases and from the left lateral atrial artery in 8%.w12 The latter arises from the proximal to the mid portion of the LCx and demonstrates an S-shaped course between the LAA and the LSPV to reach the transverse pericardial sinus. This artery has been detected in 14% of coronary CT angiographies.19 The S-shaped SAN artery can be at risk of injury during placement of LAA exclusion devices.
CT is the modality of choice to demonstrate the relationship of the vessels with the LAA ostium. Other vessels that can be seen in the ridge between the LAA and LSPV are the persistent left superior vena cava and the vein of Marshall4 (figure 15). The vein or ligament of Marshall is located at the epicardial aspect of the ridge in close proximity to the endocardial surface, at a distance of 3 mm from the superior level of the ridge in almost 75% of the specimens, along with abundant autonomic nerves bundles.
Left phrenic nerve
The phrenic nerves lie along the lateral mediastinum, and run from the thoracic inlet to the diaphragmw13 (box 1). In our study of cadavers, the left phrenic nerve and its accompanying pericardiophrenic vessels passed in the fibrous pericardium that was overlying the tip of the appendage in 59% of hearts and over the neck of the appendage in 23%20 (figure 16). CT angiography demonstrated the left phrenic neurovascular bundle and its relationship to the LAA as it passes over the pericardium in almost two-thirds of studiesw14 (figure 16).
You can get CPD/CME credits for Education in Heart
Education in Heart articles are accredited by both the UK Royal College of Physicians (London) and the European Board for Accreditation in Cardiology—you need to answer the accompanying multiple choice questions (MCQs). To access the questions, click on BMJ Learning: Take this module on BMJ Learning from the content box at the top right and bottom left of the online article. For more information please go to: http://heart.bmj.com/misc/education.dtl
RCP credits: Log your activity in your CPD diary online (http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/members/CPDdiary/index.asp)—pass mark is 80%.
EBAC credits: Print out and retain the BMJ Learning certificate once you have completed the MCQs—pass mark is 60%. EBAC/ EACCME Credits can now be converted to AMA PRA Category 1 CME Credits and are recognised by all National Accreditation Authorities in Europe (http://www.ebac-cme.org/newsite/?hit=men02).
Please note: The MCQs are hosted on BMJ Learning—the best available learning website for medical professionals from the BMJ Group. If prompted, subscribers must sign into Heart with their journal's username and password. All users must also complete a one-time registration on BMJ Learning and subsequently log in (with a BMJ Learning username and password) on every visit.
- ↵This article outlines the role of echocardiography at each stage of LAA occlusion. Pre-procedural echocardiography is used to screen suitable candidates and to define LAA morphology and dimensions.
- ↵This article re-examines the anatomy and structure of the left atrium from the viewpoint of an electrophysiologist.
- ↵This study provides an insight into the muscular structure of the left lateral atrial ridge and associated structures in this region.
- ↵This study reveals various morphologic parameters of the LAA by CT to aid the preoperative planning and implantation of LAA closure devices.
- ↵This study defined the morphology of the LAA in normal autopsy specimen hearts and considered the implications of these findings for TOE studies.
- ↵This study investigated the LAA by CT and MRI to categorise different LAA morphologies and to correlate the morphology with the history of stroke/transient ischaemic attack.
- ↵This study examined the LAA and its relationship to neighbouring structures that may be put at risk when intervening to occlude its ostium.
- ↵The aim of this study was to determine the performance of real-time 3D TOE for LAA orifice size assessment, compared with 2D TOE, and to investigate the impact of AF on LAA orifice size.
- ↵The objective of this study was to assess the cumulative experience of a single operator using a strict set of deployment and release criteria for the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and the impact of these criteria on procedural success and complications.
- ↵This study aimed to compare: (1) TOE measurements of the LAA with postmortem casts; and (2) TOE with the postmortem diagnosis of LAA thrombi.
- ↵This study revealed the correlation between LAA morphology and the burden of silent cerebral ischaemia as a new thromboembolic risk marker in atrial fibrillation patients.
- ↵This is the first study on the myoarchitecture of the human atria.
- ↵This study evaluated the depiction of anatomic characteristics of the arterial supply to the sinoatrial node and the AV node with 64-section CT.
- ↵This study clarifies the spatial relationships between the left phrenic nerve and LAA which is essential to reduce risks during the epicardial or endocardial approach to percutaneous LAA exclusion.
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Data supplement 1 - Online supplement
Funding This project was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (Spain), grant no. TIN2012–37546-C03-02.
Competing interests In compliance with EBAC/EACCME guidelines, all authors participating in Education in Heart have disclosed potential conflicts of interest that might cause a bias in the article. The authors have no competing interests.
Ethics approval Bioethics Committee of the University of Extremadura.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.