Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment and quantification of aortic regurgitation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  1. Henrique B Ribeiro,
  2. Florent Le Ven,
  3. Éric Larose,
  4. Abdellaziz Dahou,
  5. Luis Nombela-Franco,
  6. Marina Urena,
  7. Ricardo Allende,
  8. Ignacio Amat-Santos,
  9. Maria de la Paz Ricapito,
  10. Christophe Thébault,
  11. Marie-Annick Clavel,
  12. Robert Delarochelliére,
  13. Daniel Doyle,
  14. Éric Dumont,
  15. Jean G Dumesnil,
  16. Philippe Pibarot,
  17. Josep Rodés-Cabau
  1. Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Josep Rodés-Cabau, Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Laval University, 2725 Chemin Ste-Foy, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada G1V 4G5; josep.rodes{at}


Background The transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) evaluation of the severity of residual aortic regurgitation (AR) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been controversial and lacks validation.

Objectives This study sought to compare TTE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for assessment of AR in patients undergoing TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve.

Methods TTE and CMR exams were performed pre-TAVI in 50 patients and were repeated postprocedure in 42 patients. All imaging data were analysed in centralised core laboratories.

Results The severity of native AR as determined by multiparametric TTE approach correlated well with the regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction determined by CMR prior to TAVI (Rs=0.79 and 0.80, respectively; p<0.001 for both). However, after TAVI, the correlation between the prosthetic AR severity assessed by TTE and regurgitant volume and fraction measured by CMR was only modest (Rs=0.59 and 0.59, respectively; p<0.001 for both), with an underestimation of AR severity by TTE in 61.9% of patients (1 grade in 59.5%). The TTE jet diameter in parasternal view and the multiparametric approach (Rs=0.62 and 0.59, respectively; both with p<0.001) showed the best correlation with CMR regurgitant fraction post-TAVI. The circumferential extent of prosthetic paravalvular regurgitation showed a poor correlation with CMR regurgitant volume and fraction (Rs=0.32, p=0.084; Rs=0.36, p=0.054, respectively).

Conclusions The severity of AR following TAVI with a balloon-expandable valve was underestimated by echocardiography as compared with CMR. The jet diameter, but not the circumferential extent of the leaks, and the multiparametric echocardiography integrative approach best correlated with CMR findings. These results provide important insight into the evaluation of AR severity post-TAVI.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles