Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Aortic stenosis begets aortic stenosis: between a rock and a hard place?
  1. M R Dweck1,2,
  2. T A Pawade1,2,
  3. D E Newby1,2
  1. 1Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  2. 2Edinburgh Heart Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Marc R Dweck, British Heart Foundation/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Room SU 305, Chancellor's Building, University of Edinburgh, 49 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; marc.dweck{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Aortic stenosis is the major cause of valve disease in the Western world and a growing healthcare burden. We lack medication capable of slowing disease progression and so rely on aortic valve replacement in patients with severe disease and symptoms. Predicting when this will occur is challenging with the literature suggesting on average slow progression with wide individual variation (rate of change in the mean gradient of ∼3±3 mm Hg/year). Annual or biannual clinical review is therefore required in all patients with serial echocardiography performed in order to track progressive valve narrowing.1 This incurs significant costs and a method capable of predicting the future natural history of aortic stenosis and the likely timing of valve surgery could help streamline patient care.

It is on this background that Nguyen et al2 investigated whether an association exists between baseline aortic stenosis severity and the rate of disease progression. In 149 patients with largely mild and moderate disease, the average rate of haemodynamic progression after a mean follow-up of 2.9±1.0 years was again +3±3 mm Hg/year (mean gradient). As anticipated the fastest rates of progression were observed in those patients with the most advanced aortic stenosis …

View Full Text


  • Contributors All the authors have helped draft the manuscript and accompanying figure.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Valvular heart disease
    Virginia Nguyen Claire Cimadevilla Candice Estellat Isabelle Codogno Virginie Huart Joelle Benessiano Xavier Duval Philippe Pibarot Marie Annick Clavel Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Alec Vahanian David Messika-Zeitoun
  • Heartbeat
    Catherine M Otto