Statistics from Altmetric.com
Review the different qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative methods for an echocardiography assessment of mitral regurgitation severity.
Review the strengths and limitations of the main approaches for mitral regurgitation severity assessment using echocardiography.
A practical step by step algorithm for primary mitral regurgitation severity assessment with echocardiography will be proposed.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is becoming increasingly prevalent, despite the reduced incidence of rheumatic disease, and is anticipated to increase in prevalence as the population ages. Approximately 10% of people ≥75 years of age have significant MR; these patients have decreased survival regardless of whether MR is a consequence of a primary mitral valve abnormality or secondary to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction.1 Surgery is only indicated in patients with severe MR, so an accurate quantification of MR severity is mandatory.
Several methods may be used for quantification of MR severity. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used for MR evaluation and provides assessment of the effects of regurgitant lesions on cardiac chambers; however, it is not widely available, dedicated imaging phases are required that can be time consuming, significant experience is necessary, and accuracy and reproducibility data are limited. Using cardiac catheterisation, assessment of regurgitation may be limited when based on a single projection and requires assumptions regarding jet geometry. Cardiac CT (CCT) has the highest spatial resolution, but limitations arise from its poor temporal resolution, its inability to assess flow, and radiation exposure.2
Echocardiography remains the cornerstone for the evaluation of MR. It allows comprehensive evaluation of MR, from aetiology and mechanism to severity assessment and impact on cardiac morphology and function. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the first line imaging technique for the diagnosis and complete evaluation of MR. In most cases TTE is enough to derive a full characterisation of the pathology. However, in selected cases of poor acoustic …
Contributors JLZ, CFG and AGG contributed to the planning, conduct and reporting of the work. JLZ is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.
Competing interests In compliance with EBAC/EACCME guidelines, all authors participating in Education in Heart have disclosed potential conflicts of interest that might cause a bias in the article. The authors have no competing interests.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.