Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Body composition and the obesity paradox in coronary heart disease: can heavier really be healthier?
  1. Carl J Lavie,
  2. Alban De Schutter,
  3. Richard V Milani
  1. Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Carl J Lavie, Exercise Laboratories, John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, 1514 Jefferson Highway, New Orleans, LA 70121-2483, USA; clavie{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

If we were sitting with two patients who had coronary heart disease (CHD), possibly post myocardial infarction, 20 years ago, and one had a body mass index (BMI) of 23 kg/m2, or ‘normal’ BMI, and the other had a BMI of 32 kg/m2, or class I obesity, we would have likely been much more concerned about the short-term and long-term prognosis in the heavier patient. However, during the past 15 years, considerable evidence from our own studies and meta-analyses tell us that we were not just incorrect, but actually flat out wrong regarding our prognostication in these two patients!1–3 Using a meta-analysis of 89 studies in over 1.3 million patients with established CHD, by far the largest of such studies, Wang et al4 confirmed the information from prior studies, and provided several important new observations on this interesting and controversial topic.

How can obesity be protective?

When we (CJL, RVM) and others first made these observations 15 years ago, about the obesity paradox in heart failure (HF), there were concerns that there may be fatal flaws in our data. Certainly, excess body weight is associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, including hypertension (HTN), lipids, glucose and inflammation, and is associated with an increased risk of almost all CV diseases (CVD), including HTN, CHD, HF and atrial fibrillation.1–3 Therefore, no expert to our knowledge is suggesting that obesity is a ‘good thing’, and support for the obesity paradox does not make this claim. However, 15 years later, it is hard to deny the fact that at least mild increases in BMI in patients with CVD appear to be associated with a better prognosis than noted in patients with low BMI.

Is BMI the problem?

As Wang et al4 alluded to, some have suggested that since BMI includes total …

View Full Text


  • Contributors All authors contributed to this editorial.

  • Competing interests CJL is the author of the book, The Obesity Paradox, and in the past has received honorarium from the Coca-Cola Company on fitness/obesity, but not related with their products.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles