Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cardiovascular highlights from non-cardiology journals

    Statistics from

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Outcomes with increased length of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI

    The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. Although observational studies have suggested DAPT for longer than a year post-PCI reduces ischemic events, other studies suggest longer durations of DAPT confer no benefits despite increased bleeding risk. This randomized controlled trial evaluated patient outcomes with 12-months vs 30-months of DAPT after PCI. A total of 22,866 patients after PCI with a drug-eluting stent (approximately 40% in the context of an ACS) were enrolled. After 12 months of standard DAPT (with either clopidogrel or prasugrel alongside aspirin) a total of 9961 patients who had tolerated DAPT without complications and who had not undergone any further procedures were randomly assigned to continue receiving DAPT treatment or to aspirin and placebo for an additional 18 months. The co-primary end-point was stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with a primary safety end-point of moderate or severe bleeding. Long-term continuation of DAPT significantly reduced the rate of stent thrombosis (0.4% vs. 1.4%; HR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.48]; P<0.001) and MACE (4.3% vs. 5.9%; HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.85]; P<0.001) …

    View Full Text


    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.