Article info

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Differences in patient outcomes after conventional versus real time perfusion stress echocardiography in men versus women: a prospective randomised trial

Authors

  • Zenab Laiq Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983332 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Lynette M Smith College of Public Health Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984375 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Feng Xie Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Mohammed Chamsi-Pasha Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Thomas R Porter Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Thomas R Porter, Division of Cardiology, 982265 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA; trporter{at}unmc.edu
View Full Text

Citation

Laiq Z, Smith LM, Xie F, et al
Differences in patient outcomes after conventional versus real time perfusion stress echocardiography in men versus women: a prospective randomised trial

Publication history

  • Received September 23, 2014
  • Revised December 31, 2014
  • Accepted January 3, 2015
  • First published January 21, 2015.
Online issue publication 
March 04, 2015

Article Versions

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.