Article Text

Download PDFPDF
178 Angiotensin-(1–9) inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and neointimal formation in vivo
  1. Clare A McKinney,
  2. Simon Kennedy,
  3. George Baillie,
  4. Graeme Milligan,
  5. Stuart A Nicklin
  1. University of Glasgow


Vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) proliferation and migration underlie the pathogenesis of vein graft failure and in-stent restenosis. Current interventions inhibit both SMC and endothelial cell (EC) growth, leading to thrombosis and re-occlusion. Angiotensin II (AngII) is a key regulator of VSMC proliferation and migration. A counter-regulatory axis of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified which inhibits AngII and is centred around angiotensin converting enzyme2 and Ang-(1–7) acting at Mas. We recently reported Ang-(1–9) as a novel member of this axis, acting at the angiotensin type 2 receptor (AT2R) to inhibit cardiac remodelling. Here we investigated the role of Ang-(1–9) in human SMC and EC migration and proliferation and vascular injury in vivo, and compared it to Ang-(1–7).

SMC and EC were isolated from human saphenous veins. To assess migration, EC and SMC were stimulated with Ang II and Ang-(1–9) or Ang-(1–7) +/- the AT1R, AT2R or Mas antagonists losartan, PD123,319 (PD) or A779, respectively, and a wound healing assay performed. To assess proliferation, EC and SMC were stimulated with fetal calf serum (FCS) and Ang-(1–9) or Ang-(1–7) ± losartan, PD or A779. Proliferation was assessed using MTS and Edu assays. An in vivo mouse model was established via wire injury to the carotid artery. Ang-(1–7) or Ang-(1–9) ± PD or A779 were delivered subcutaneously via minipumps and neointima (NI) formation quantified 28 days post injury.

Ang-(1–9) and Ang-(1–7) inhibited Ang II induced VSMC migration (Ang II 98.9 ± 1.1%, Ang-(1–9) 43.3 ± 3.3% and Ang-(1–7) 41.8 ± 4.6% wound closure; P < 0.001 vs Ang II). Furthermore, both peptides significantly inhibited FCS induced VSMC proliferation (P < 0.05). The inhibitory effects of Ang-(1–9) and Ang-(1–7) on VSMC migration and proliferation were selectively blocked by PD and A779, respectively, suggesting Ang-(1–9) acts via the AT2R and Ang-(1–7) via Mas. Neither Ang-(1–9) or Ang-(1–7) prevented EC migration or proliferation. In vivo wire injury of the mouse carotid artery induced significant NI formation at 28days (NI/media area (NI/MA) 0.80 ± 0.07 injured control vs 0.01 ± 0.01 sham; P < 0.001); this was attenuated by Ang-(1–9) (NI/MA 0.17 ± 0.1; P < 0.001 vs injured control) and Ang-(1–7) (NI/MA 0.40 ± 0.07; P < 0.05 vs injured control). The effects of Ang-(1–9) were blocked by PD (P < 0.001 vs Ang-(1–9) alone) while the effects of Ang-(1–7) were blocked by A779 (P < 0.05 vs Ang-(1–7) alone), suggesting that in vivo Ang-(1–9) acts via the AT2R and Ang-(1–7) acts via Mas.

We demonstrate for a novel, direct effect of Ang-(1–9) in inhibiting VSMC proliferation and migration in vitro, and reducing neointimal formation in vivo via the AT2R. These data provide further insight into the role of the Ang-(1–9)/AT2R interaction in the vasculature and highlights the potential of Ang-(1–9) as a therapeutic agent for vascular remodelling.

  • Angiotensin-(1-9)
  • Vascular remodelling
  • Smooth muscle cell

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.