Article Text

Download PDFPDF
97 Men and Women differ in their Adaptation to Aortic Stenosis and in Reverse Remodelling following Aortic Valve Intervention
  1. Laura Dobson1,
  2. Tarique Musa1,
  3. Aklaque Uddin1,
  4. Daniel Blackman2,
  5. Timothy Fairbairn1,
  6. Peter Swoboda1,
  7. Bara Erhayiem1,
  8. David Ripley1,
  9. Adam McDiarmid1,
  10. Pankaj Garg1,
  11. Sven Plein1,
  12. John Greenwood1
  1. 1University of Leeds
  2. 2Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust


Background Outcomes following aortic valve intervention may differ according to gender. It has been suggested that men and women adapt differently to aortic stenosis (AS) but the effect of gender on left ventricular (LV) remodelling following valve intervention is not well described. We sought to establish using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, the reference standard non-invasive technique for the assessment of LV mass (LVM) and function, whether there was any difference between genders in LV remodelling in severe AS at baseline and reverse remodelling six months following aortic valve intervention.

Methods 100 patients (60 men) with symptomatic severe AS undergoing surgical or percutaneous aortic valve intervention were prospectively recruited between April 2009 and March 2014. Patients with contraindications to CMR were excluded and all patients provided informed written consent. All patients underwent an identical 1.5T CMR protocol (Intera, Philips) prior to and at a median of 6 months following aortic valve intervention (IQR 5–6 months). Multi slice, multiphase imaging was carried out using a standard steady-state free procession pulse sequence in axial and short axis to cover the entire left heart. Quantitative analysis was performed using dedicated computer software (CVI42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Alberta, Canada).

Results Basic demographic, clinical and echocardiographic data can be seen in Table 1.

Abstract 97 Table 1

Basic demographic, clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. Data expressed as mean ± SD

Abstract 97 Table 2

CMR values according to gender prior to and 6 months following valve intervention. Values expressed as mean ± SD

Women were older than men but were similar in terms of co-morbidity, surgical risk and valvular haemodynamics. At baseline, women had lower indexed LVM (LVMi) than men and a smaller indexed LV end diastolic volume (LVEDVi). Baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and indexed left atrial volume (LAVi) were similar between sexes. Following valvular intervention, LVMi was significantly reduced in both sexes, however, this was more marked in men (18.28 ± 10.63 vs 12.69 ± 8.84, p = 0.007). There was an improvement in LV longitudinal function and a decrease in LAVi in men but not in women. Neither group experienced a significant change in LVEF following intervention (men 54.84 ± 12.94% to 56.52 ± 10.50%, p = 0.093; women 58.61 ± 10.57 to 60.20 ± 11.00, p = 0.129). Both groups also experienced a significant reduction in LVEDVi following valve intervention, with a trend towards a more pronounced reduction in men (men 11.55 ± 20.31 ml/m2 vs women 5.39 ± 14.10 ml/m2, p = 0.141).

Conclusion Men and women with AS remodel differently with more hypertrophy and larger LV cavity size in men. Six months following valvular intervention, men but not women experience an improvement in LV longitudinal function and a decrease in left atrial size. These surrogate markers of a reduced left atrial pressure may be accounted for by the greater magnitude of LVM regression seen in men.

  • aortic valve
  • aortic valve replacement
  • left ventricular remodelling

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.