Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Predicting the future: a matter of time
  1. Jarett D Berry1,2
  1. 1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  2. 2Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jarett D Berry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9047,USA; jarett.berry{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction has been the cornerstone of prevention practice for decades because it identifies the individuals most likely to benefit from therapeutic intervention. While the relative risk reduction observed with lipid-lowering therapy is similar for patients with low and high absolute risk, the clinical impact of lipid-lowering therapy depends on the baseline absolute risk and consequently, the absolute risk reduction. It is for this reason that both US1 and European2 prevention guidelines emphasise global CVD risk estimation as a guide to treatment decisions.

While there is broad agreement on the importance of absolute risk, the clinical application of these risk estimates has been the subject of considerable debate. In the past, statin therapy was more expensive and therefore guidelines recommended treatment for only those at the higher end of the risk distribution. However, with generic statins and decades of safety data, guidelines have lowered risk thresholds with many more patients now candidates for therapy, giving rise to new concerns about treating too many, rather than too few patients.

Despite these changing trends in short-term risk treatment thresholds, other more fundamental challenges persist—namely, age remains the dominant determinant of short-term absolute risk …

View Full Text


  • Contributors JDB is solely responsible for the present work. The corresponding author had full access to all data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. The author has read and agrees to the manuscript as written.

  • Funding JDB receives funding from (1) the Dedman Family Scholar in Clinical Care endowment at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and (2) 14SFRN20740000 from the American Heart Association prevention network.

  • Competing interests JDB reports receiving speakers bureau honoraria from Merck.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles