Statistics from Altmetric.com
Despite therapeutic advances in the management of heart failure (HF), approximately 25% of hospitalised patients with HF are readmitted within 30 days.1 These costly episodes of care have given rise to numerous policy initiatives, such as the Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Programme which fiscally penalises hospitals with ‘excess’ readmissions.2
Transitional care programmes have emerged as a potential solution to avert HF readmissions by monitoring and supporting patients and caregivers for a limited period of time post-discharge. A recent meta-analysis of these interventions suggests that programmes which incorporate home visits are effective at reducing all-cause readmission and mortality, whereas less-intensive programmes of structured telephone support alone can reduce HF-related readmissions and mortality.3
In their Heart publication, Wong et al report the findings from their pilot trial of a transitional palliative care programme for patients with end-stage HF (TPC-ESHF).4 They demonstrate that patients randomised to their TPC-ESHF intervention experienced significantly fewer hospital readmissions at 12-week follow-up compared with their attention control (relative risk (95% CI) 0.55 (0.35 to 0.88)) along with significant improvements in health-related quality of life (QOL), satisfaction with care and symptom burden.
These results are striking, particularly for a study of its size. As the authors note, a comparative effectiveness trial is in order to confirm their findings and to address key limitations in their pilot. First, their study population vastly differs from similar HF trials, namely regarding social support and the low use of evidence-based therapy for an …
Contributors DK conceptualised the article. All authors contributed substantially to the article and approved the final draft.
Funding DK received research support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS022989), as well as a Junior Faculty Career Development Award from the National Palliative Care Research Center.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.