You are here

Article Text

Article menu

This article has a Reply. Please see:

Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Correspondence
Response: a novel troponin I rule-out value below the upper reference limit for acute myocardial infarction
  1. Andrew R Chapman,
  2. Atul Anand,
  3. Anoop S V Shah,
  4. Philip D Adamson,
  5. Nicholas L Mills
  1. BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrew R Chapman, BHF/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Room SU305, Chancellor's Building, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, UK; A.R.Chapman{at}ed.ac.uk

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309958

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    To the Editor,

    Goorden et al aim to establish the optimal threshold to rule out myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay. They report that a cardiac troponin I concentration <10 ng/L or a change of <20 ng/L on serial testing had a negative predictive value for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction of 99.8% and 98.7%, respectively.1 While we agree that there are better approaches to rule out myocardial infarction than using the 99th centile upper reference limit,2 ,3 we have several …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Funding British Heart Foundation Special Project Grant (SP/12/10/29922), Project Grant (PG/15/51/31596) and Senior Clinical Research Fellowship (FS/16/14/32023), Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation Research Fellowship (50-534).

    • Competing interests AA has received speaker fees from Abbott Laboratories. ASVS has acted as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories. NLM has acted as a consultant for Abbott Laboratories, Beckman-Coulter, Roche and Singulex.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles