Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Antithrombotic drug use: scientific breakthroughs, biological limits and physician behaviour
  1. Elaine M Hylek
  1. Correspondence to Dr Elaine M Hylek, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 801 Massachusetts Avenue, 2nd floor, Boston, MA 02118, USA; ehylek{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

During the past 25 years, there has been a dramatic surge in the use of antithrombotic drugs as documented in the Heart paper by Adelborg et al.1 The authors derived their findings from the Danish drug utilisation database, which is unique in its comprehensiveness and ability to capture over-the-counter aspirin. The increased prescription of antithrombotic drugs is fuelled by a better understanding of disease and risk, population growth, ageing societies, improved methods of detection, and rising global rates of obesity, a recognised risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF), venous thromboembolic (VTE) disease, and cardiovascular disease.

Several landmark randomised trials published in the early 1990s definitively demonstrated the efficacy of warfarin to prevent stroke for AF unrelated to rheumatic mitral stenosis or prosthetic heart valves.2 Collectively, these trials are responsible for the paradigm shift in our understanding of the thrombogenicity associated with AF based on the triad first described by Virchow: stasis, endothelial dysfunction, and hypercoagulability. These …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests EMH has served as a scientific consultant for Armetheon, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Medronic, Portola, Pfizer. EMH has served as a speaker in scientific symposia for Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, and Bristol Myers Squibb.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles