Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cochrane corner: implantable loop recorder versus conventional workup for unexplained recurrent syncope
  1. Monica Solbiati1,2,
  2. Giovanni Casazza3,
  3. Franca Dipaola4,
  4. Robert S Sheldon5,
  5. Giorgio Costantino1
  1. 1 Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specializzazioni Mediche, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy
  2. 2 Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
  3. 3 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche ‘L. Sacco’, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
  4. 4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University—Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
  5. 5 Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Monica Solbiati, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specializzazioni Mediche, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, Milano 20122, Italy; monica.solbiati{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Syncope is a frequent reason for medical consultation and hospital admission and is associated with high health service use and costs.1 ,2 From the pathophysiological standpoint, syncope is a transient loss of consciousness due to transient global cerebral hypoperfusion and can be the final common pathway of different conditions, whose prognosis is highly heterogeneous.3 Indeed, cardiovascular syncope (due to bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias or structural heart disease) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, while the prognosis of reflex syncope (vasovagal, situational and carotid sinus syndrome) and syncope due to orthostatic hypotension is generally benign.4

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are small devices implanted or injected subcutaneously in the left side of the chest under local anaesthesia. They continuously record and delete a bipolar ECG signal with no need for intravascular leads and have a battery capable of storing significant events for up to 36 months. Thanks to their ability to register the patients' ECG during spontaneous symptoms, ILRs have gained popularity and are now recommended as an early diagnostic tool in the evaluation of unexplained syncope.3 However, randomised clinical trials (RCTs) proving that an ILR-guided diagnosis and treatment changes clinically relevant outcomes, besides increasing the diagnostic rate, are essential to support their use in clinical practice.

We conducted a Cochrane review of RCTs to compare ILRs and …

View Full Text


  • Contributors MS and GCo drafted the manuscript. GCa, FD and RSS critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content. All authors contributed substantially to this manuscript and approved its final version.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.