Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Cardiovascular highlights from non-cardiology journals
  1. Steven M Bradley, JournalScan Editor

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation

Whether repair or replacement is the preferred approach to surgical correction of ischemic mitral regurgitation is debated. The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network previously reported 1-year results of a randomized study of these two approached and found no differences echocardiographic or clinical outcomes. This paper reports the 2-year echocardiographic and clinical outcome results from this randomized trial of 251 patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation. At 2 years follow-up, there were no significant differences in mortality (19% after repair versus 23% after replacement; P=0.39). Compared with replacement, the rate of recurrence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was significantly higher following repair (58.8% …

View Full Text