Aims Unexplained falls account for 20% of falls in older cohorts. The role of the implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the detection of arrhythmias in patients with unexplained falls is unknown. We aimed to examine the diagnostic utility of the ILR in detection of arrhythmogenic causes of unexplained falls in older patients.
Methods A single centre, prospective, observational cohort study of recurrent fallers over the age of 50 years with two or more unexplained falls presenting to an emergency department. Insertion of an ILR (Reveal, Medtronic, Minnesota, USA) was used to detect arrhythmia. The primary outcome was detection of cardiac arrhythmia associated with a fall or syncope. The secondary outcome was detection of cardiac arrhythmia independent of falls or syncope, and falls or syncope without associated arrhythmia.
Results Seventy patients, mean age 70 years (51–85 years) received an ILR. In 70% of patients cardiac arrhythmias were detected at a mean time of 47.3 days (SD 48.25). In 20%, falls were attributable to a modifiable cardiac arrhythmia; 10 (14%) received a cardiac pacemaker, 4 (6%) had treatment for supraventricular tachycardia. Patients who had a cardiac arrhythmia detected were more likely to experience a further fall.
Conclusions 14 (20%) patients demonstrated an arrhythmia which was attributable as the cause of their fall. Patients who have cardiac arrhythmia are significantly more likely to experience future falls. Further research is important to investigate if early detection of arrhythmogenic causes of falls using the ILR prevents future falls in older patients.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Falls are the most common cause of injury and associated morbidity and mortality in older people.1 Due to accelerated growth of the global ageing demographic, the number of fall-related presentations to the emergency department (ED) has increased by >50% in the last two decades.2 Falls are the single most common reason for older patients to attend the ED, accounting for one-third of all adult attendances.1 ,3 Falls in older adults are more likely to be associated with significant injury, including hip fractures, and more likely to lead to hospital admission.4 Direct and indirect costs of falls are >£2 billion per year in the UK and US$30 billion in the USA per year.1 ,5 Up to one-fifth of older fallers have no obvious cause for their fall event and are classified as ‘unexplained’ or ‘non-accidental’ falls.6 In the emergency setting the injury sustained following a fall is very often the primary focus of medical attention and important risk modification opportunities may be overlooked.
With advancing age cardiovascular morbidity plays an important role in the aetiology of syncope and unexplained falls. There is strong evidence of an overlap between syncope and unexplained falls in older people. Syncope is defined as transient loss of consciousness (T-LOC) due to transient global cerebral hypoperfusion characterised by rapid onset, short duration and spontaneous complete recovery.7 Up to 40% of older fallers have amnesia for loss of consciousness, and 60% of community dwelling older people have no witness to a fall event.8 ,9 Thus ‘syncope’ is likely to present as a fall in the absence of a witness account, coupled with amnesia for loss of consciousness. These patients are also more likely to sustain a serious injury.10
Falls have been associated with orthostatic hypotension (OH), vasovagal syncope (VVS), carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) and cardiac arrhythmias, but attributing a single cause for syncope and unexplained falls is challenging and diagnostic clarity can be elusive.11 Recently, implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have greatly contributed to the diagnosis of arrhythmia as a cause of syncope.12 The most recent European Society of Cardiology (ESC) syncope guidelines recommend that ILR monitoring should be considered in patients with recurrent, unexplained syncope or falls after conventional work-up,13 although the evidence for the use of ILR monitoring in patients with unexplained falls is lacking.
We hypothesise that cardiac arrhythmias are an underdiagnosed cause of unexplained falls. The objective of this study is to determine the diagnostic utility of cardiac loop recorders in detection of arrhythmogenic causes for unexplained falls in older patients.
A single centre, prospective, observational cohort study of recurrent fallers (defined as two or more falls in the previous year) was undertaken. All patients >50 years who presented to the ED as a result of an unexplained fall were screened during a 6-month period. A ‘fall’ was defined as an event which resulted in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level;14 an ‘unexplained fall’, as an event for which a cause was not apparent, either intrinsic (eg, stroke, myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage or other medical diagnosis) or extrinsic (eg, trip over carpet).15 All patients provided written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval was obtained (reference number 2012/12/18).
Between the hours of 09:00 and 17:00, a research doctor and nurse screened all patients presenting to ED. ED records of patients presenting outside these hours were screened daily and eligible patients were contacted by telephone and invited to participate in the study. Patients with a life expectancy of <12 months, cognitive impairment (defined as a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) <24),16 a pacemaker in situ or prior diagnosis of a syncope syndrome were excluded. Patients with no access to a telephone landline were also excluded.
A comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed on all patients detailing falls history, fear of falling using the Falls Efficacy Scale (maximum score 0/100),17 medications history (classified according to the British National Formulary), polypharmacy (defined as five or more drugs), timed up and go test (TUG) (abnormal score 13.5 s),18 balance and mobility assessment (performance oriented mobility assessment (POMA)) (maximum score 56),19 mental health scores (Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) (maximum score 60)20 and medical history (self-report, doctor diagnosed). Where risk factors for falls were detected, falls prevention interventions were delivered in keeping with current guidelines prior to insertion of ILR.21
Cardiovascular assessment was undertaken in line with ESC guidelines,7 and included a 12-lead ECG, phasic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) measurement during orthostatic change from supine (10 min resting period) to upright over a 3 min period (active stand) with ECG and phasic BP recordings (BeatScope Finometer data). Carotid sinus massage (supine left and right and upright position at 70°), and head-up tilt-table test were performed when indicated.22 Patients with OH, vasodepressor carotid sinus hypersensitivity and suspected VVS had appropriate interventions. Patients diagnosed with cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome (CICSS), sinus bradycardia, first, second or third degree atrioventricular block (AVB), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) were withdrawn from the study and appropriate treatment instituted (figure 1).
Implantable loop recorder
Remaining consented patients underwent ILR (Reveal, Medtronic, Minnesota, USA) implantation (figure 1). The ILR device was implanted in the left parasternal region, under aseptic conditions. It is capable of storing ECG data automatically in response to a significant bradycardia or tachyarrhythmia and in response to patient activation. The ILR DX model was used in the initial stage of the study and the ILR XT model in the latter stage when it became available, as it is a superior model for detection of atrial fibrillation. ECG data were downloaded and interpreted remotely on a daily basis using the CARELINK system (Medtronic) with all patient activations as well as preprogrammed alerts reviewed. Patients were instructed to activate the device after syncope, presyncope or fall. Any cardiac arrhythmias detected during the study were treated as appropriate (figure 1).
Participants returned weekly symptom diaries, with regular telephone prompting (biweekly) to optimise compliance. Details on the circumstance of each fall or syncopal event together with prodromal symptoms, consequences (ie, fracture, head injury) and hospital and ED attendances were recorded. Patients who had a subsequent fall during the trial were reviewed by a member of the investigating team and modifiable risk factors were treated at that time. Patients also attended for scheduled clinical review at six monthly intervals. The minimum follow-up was 6 months.
The primary outcome measure was detection of cardiac arrhythmia associated with a fall or syncope after implantation of the ILR. Cardiac arrhythmias detected by the ILR were defined according to ISSUE classification.23 The secondary outcome measure was (a) detection of cardiac arrhythmia independent of falls or syncope after implantation of the ILR and (b) a subsequent fall or syncope episode without associated arrhythmia after initial clinical assessment and implantation of ILR.
SAS software (V.9.3) was used for the calculation of sample size requirements with the Clopper–Pearson exact binomial method using a two-sided 95% CI. The expected proportion of patients, who have an arrhythmia within 1 year, was 0.33. This estimate was based on previous studies that used a sample size of 200 to detect an 18% improvement in ECG diagnosis.24 Under these assumptions, a sample size of 45 subjects with 1-year follow-up was required for the evaluation of this objective. Assuming an attrition rate of 10%, a minimum sample size of 50 subjects was required.
Means and SDs or number and percentages were calculated for patients’ baseline characteristics. Patient characteristics including the number and percentage use of medicines, and polypharmacy between the arrhythmia and non-arrhythmia group were compared using Fisher's exact test, with significance at p<0.05 assumed. Student's t test was used for continuous variables.
A total of 970 ED fallers were screened over the study period (figure 1). In that 84 patients were eligible for study inclusion as they had presented to ED because of an unexplained fall, had at least two falls in the previous year and an MMSE >24 (figure 1). Of these a cardiac arrhythmia or conduction disorder was diagnosed at initial cardiovascular assessment in nine patients, and therefore they did not proceed to ILR implantation. Arrhythmias detected at this assessment included five CICSS, one VVS, two trifascicular block, one second degree AVB.
Seventy patients underwent ILR implantation (83% of original screening cohort), mean age 70 years (SD±10.02, range 50–82 years), 45 females (63%), median MMSE of 28 (range 24–30). The mean number of falls in the last year was 4.17 (range 2–12) per patient. The mean follow-up period was 9 months (range 6–12 months) (table 1).
Fifty patients (71.4%) had a cardiac arrhythmia detected by ILR at a mean of 47.3 days (SD 48.25, range 1–190 days) postimplantation (table 2). Fourteen (28%) met the primary end point of simultaneous fall or syncope together with a novel cardiac arrhythmia. The mean time to event in these patients was 43 days (SD 36.28). Cardiac pacing for bradycardia or asystole was required in 10 (20%) and treatment of SVT in 4 (8%) in order to prevent further falls. A further 24 patients had medication modification as a result of arrhythmias detected by the ILR. Patients who had an arrhythmia detected were more likely to have a history of comorbid diagnoses including cardiovascular disease, hypertension, depression, arthritis and hypercholesterolaemia. They were also more likely to be on five or more medications and to have suffered injurious events in their index fall (prior to enrolment into the study) (table 1).
Secondary end points
Cardiac arrhythmia independent of falls or syncope was detected in 36 (51%) patients. These included atrial fibrillation, SVT and sinus bradycardia of <50 bpm which were detected in 4 (8%), 8 (16%) and 24(48%) patients, respectively, independent of falls or syncope. Thirty-six (51%) patients had a fall or T-LOC during follow-up which was not associated with an arrhythmia; despite application of guideline-based treatment for prevention of falls. Mean time to first falls or T-LOC was 93.33 days (SD 72.15) days after implant. Patients who had a cardiac arrhythmia detected by the ILR 30 (83%) were more likely to fall during follow-up (p=0.0012) than those who did not (table 3). One patient had a witnessed seizure and was subsequently diagnosed with epilepsy. One patient had a fall that resulted in a hip fracture.
A major finding in this study is that 50 (71.4%) of older patients with unexplained falls who attend the ED have a cardiac arrhythmia that is not apparent at the time of presentation, but detected within 9 months of continuous monitoring using ILR. In 14 (20%) of these patients, events were directly attributable to a modifiable cardiac arrhythmia. A further 9 (11%) have an arrhythmia detected during the initial detailed cardiovascular assessment. Furthermore, falls were more likely to recur in patients who had cardiac arrhythmias.
We have recently demonstrated in a large population study, the Irish longitudinal study of ageing (TILDA), that cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, are retrospectively and prospectively associated with falls risk.25 Additionally, previous studies of ED cohorts support an association between falls and cardiovascular disorders such as OH, VVS and CSS and to a lesser extent cardiac arrhythmias.6 This study has demonstrated that cardiac arrhythmias occurred with a large frequency in this cohort; with 50 (71.4%) of patients having an arrhythmia detected. There were 14 (28%) major arrhythmias detected at the time of a subsequent fall which resulted in prompt, ILR guided intervention. Previous observational studies have shown a prevalence between 1% and 25% for detection of cardiac arrhythmia in older fallers.26 They differed significantly in their methods, definitions of cardiac arrhythmia and the ways in which they had captured arrhythmia. This is the first study to look at prolonged cardiac monitoring in a large group with prospective falls diaries coupled with capture of abnormal cardiac rhythms. We have provided evidence which strengthens the association between cardiac arrhythmias and falls and demonstrated that cardiac arrhythmias are a casual, modifiable risk factor in falls prevention.
Previous studies using prolonged monitoring for detection of cardiac arrhythmias has focused on syncope as a primary outcome and has supported the use of ILR in older adults. Brignole et al previously compared the use of ILR in patients over the age of 65 to those under the age of 65, referred for investigation of unexplained syncope. Syncope recurrence was 2.7 times higher and modifiable cardiac arrhythmias were 3.1 times more frequent in those >65 years.27 The diagnostic yield of ILR is higher in older patients; use of an ILR in older fallers achieved a diagnostic yield similar to that reported for syncope at 20%. Furthermore, cardiac data were obtained as a result of ILR monitoring which resulted in detection of asymptomatic cardiac arrhythmias which did not require an invasive procedure, but resulted in guided treatment interventions. For example, four patients had new atrial fibrillation detected requiring the initiation of anticoagulation and a further 24 patients had medication dosages adjusted because of the detection of cardiac arrhythmia. Our data support an initial detailed cardiovascular assessment in patients with unexplained falls and also continuous prolonged cardiac monitoring using ILR to detect underlying cardiac arrhythmias.
This study has demonstrated that those patients with cardiovascular disease, hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia were most likely to have cardiac arrhythmia detected by ILR. In addition, those with higher depression scores as well as arthritis had a higher risk of detection of cardiac arrhythmia demonstrating the multifactorial nature of falls in older adults. Our results support the American Geriatric Society (AGS)/British Geriatric Society (BGS) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, which recommend standardised cardiovascular investigations as well as a multifactorial assessment in all patients with recurrent falls in order to detect and adequately prevent future falls.21 ,28 Overall 51% of the cohort had a subsequent fall during follow-up despite application of guideline-based falls assessment and intervention emphasising that these are high-risk patients for whom new interventions are needed.21 Randomised control trials, which include multifactorial intervention for traditional falls risk factors, coupled with targeted treatment of cardiovascular disorders show benefit for falls prevention in cognitively intact older patients.29 In one study, dual-chamber cardiac pacing reduced falls by 70% during a 12-month follow-up period in patients with unexplained falls and CSS.29Despite this and other evidence, cardiovascular assessments are not consistently performed in ED.30 Further randomised studies are needed to discern if targeted intervention of arrhythmia is of benefit for falls reduction in older adults.
One explanation for the overlap between syncope and falls is amnesia for loss of consciousness.8 If patients with cardiac arrhythmia have amnesia for T-LOC and if events are not witnessed, the patient will present with an unexplained fall rather than syncope. In this study, the detection of asymptomatic arrhythmia was a common finding with the majority of arrhythmias detected not occurring at the time of a fall or collapse episode. Furthermore, bradycardia detected <50 bpm but >40 bpm was the most common type of arrhythmia described. Although these HRs are often considered a normal variant; patients with this arrhythmia were more likely to have suffered a subsequent fall than those who maintained a normal sinus rhythm. In addition, commonly measured variables predictive of gait imbalance and falls risk such as TUG and POMA scores were not significantly higher in the falls group. In the absence of concomitant BP measurement, it is difficult to ascertain the exact clinical consequences of intermittent arrhythmia. One explanation is that modest reductions in cerebral perfusion are caused by hypotension secondary to arrhythmia, resulting in balance instability and consequent falls without necessarily causing loss of consciousness.7 Another plausible explanation is that repeated episodes of arrhythmia are sufficient to result in cerebral hypoperfusion and vascular damage to neural pathways which govern balance. Further research looking at the effect of intermittent arrhythmia on BP and cerebral perfusion may provide insight into optimal HR management in older patients with falls.
This is a single site prospective observational cohort study. In this series, 10% of patients >50 years who attended ED because of a fall were classified as unexplained. This is likely to be an underestimation of the true prevalence of this condition. We excluded patients who were cognitively impaired or who were in an institution and did not have access to a landline. The prevalence of cardiac arrhythmia in these cohorts has not been studied. The implication of our findings in other settings, that is, community falls without injury, requires separate study. It may be that injurious falls are more likely to be associated with arrhythmias. A multicentre trial to determine whether the findings can be generalised and whether ILR guided intervention prevents falls is now warranted.
A better understanding of causal factors for unexplained falls is critical in order to develop more effective prevention strategies and improve successful ageing in our changing population demographic. Further studies are now required to determine whether ILR guided intervention coupled with traditional risk factor modification will prevent falls in older patients.
What is already known on this subject?
Unexplained falls account for 20% of falls in older cohorts. The role of the implantable loop recorder in the detection of arrhythmias in patients with unexplained falls is unknown.
What might this study add?
Twenty per cent of unexplained fallers demonstrate an arrhythmia which is attributable as the cause of their fall. Patients who have cardiac arrhythmia are significantly more likely to experience future falls.
How might this impact on clinical practice?
In this paper, we describe a novel approach to assessment of falls risk using an implantable loop recorder and show that cardiac arrhythmias have a high prevalence in older unexplained fallers.
Contributors All authors contributed to the production of this manuscript and the conduct of this trial.
Competing interests This trial was partly funded by Medtronic which provided the devices used for the trial.
Ethics approval St James’s Hospital.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement All additional unpublished information is kept on a secure server in the institution and only available to the first and senior author of the manuscript.