Article Text

Download PDFPDF
11 Predicting the outcome of reperfusion acutely in patients with STEMI – derivation and validation of the ATI score
  1. Giovanni Luigi De Maria1,
  2. Gregor Fahrni1,
  3. Mohammad Alkhalil1,
  4. Florim Cuculi1,2,
  5. Sam Dawkins1,
  6. Mathias Wolfrum1,
  7. Robin P Choudhury3,4,
  8. John C Forfar1,
  9. Bernard D Prendergast1,
  10. Tuncay Yetgin5,
  11. Robert Jan van Geuns5,
  12. Matteo Tebaldi6,
  13. Keith M Channon1,
  14. Rajesh K Kharbanda1,
  15. Peter M Rothwell7,
  16. Marco Valgimigli8,
  17. Adrian P Banning1
  1. 1Oxford Heart Centre, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford UK
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, LuzernerKantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
  3. 3Acute Vascular Imaging Centre, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford
  4. 4Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, BHF Centre of Research Excellence, University of Oxford
  5. 5Erasmus MC Thoraxcentrum, Rotterdam, Netherland
  6. 6Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, Ferrara, Italy
  7. 7Stroke Prevention Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
  8. 8Swiss Cardiovascular Center, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland


Aim Restoration of effective myocardial reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in patients with STEMI is not predictable. A method to assess the likelihood of a suboptimal response to conventional pharmaco-mechanical therapies could be beneficial. We aimed to derive and validate a scoring system that can be used acutely at the time of coronary reopening to predict the likelihood of downstream microvascular impairment in patients with STEMI.

Methods and Results A score estimating the risk of post-procedural microvascular injury defined by an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) > 40, was initially derived in a cohort of 85 STEMI patients (Derivation cohort). This score was then tested and validated in three further cohorts of patients (Retrospective (30 patients), Prospective (42 patients) and External (29 patients).

The ATI score [Age ( > 50 = 1); pre-stenting IMR (> 40 and < 100 = 1; ≥ 100 = 2); Thrombus score (4=1; 5=3)] was highly predictive of a post-stenting IMR > 40 in all the four cohorts (AUC:0.87; p < 0.001-Derivation cohort, 0.84; p: 0.002-Retrospective cohort, 0.92; p < 0.001-Prospective cohort and 0.81; p: 0.006-External cohort). In the whole population an ATI score ≥ 4 presented a 95.1% risk of final IMR >40, while no cases of final IMR >40 occurred in the presence of an ATI score < 2.

Conclusions The ATI score appears to be a promising tool capable of identifying patients during PPCI that are at the highest risk of an adverse outcome following revascularisation.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.