Statistics from Altmetric.com
After reading this article, the readers should be able to:
Recognise ‘red flags’ in clinical history and examination of a patient suggestive of aortic dissection and streamline the right diagnosis.
Initiate acute medical treatment and recognise the urgency for further invasive treatment.
Recognise objectives of surgical therapy and identify postoperative complications specific for patients with aortic dissection.
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a relatively rare but much-feared clinical presentation which has a high mortality, particularly if definitive treatment is delayed. A combination of aortic wall stress and abnormalities of the medial layer of the aortic wall leads to disruption of the media and an intimal tear with subsequent penetration of blood, which splits the aortic wall layers. This creates a cavity within the medial layer, the so-called false lumen (FL), which is separated from the native true lumen (TL) by the dissection membrane.1 This process can result in disruption of the adventitia (aortic rupture) or in a second tear in the dissection membrane, which allows blood to re-enter the TL. If AAD occurs within the ascending aorta (AA), 40% of patients die immediately and mortality is 1%–2% for each hour afterwards resulting in a 48-hour mortality of approximately 50% (see figure 1).2
The most important risk factor for the development of AAD is poorly controlled hypertension. Men are more often affected and the risk increases with age. Other important pathogenic factors are positive family history and genetic history (connective tissue disease, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan syndrome), aortic disease and aortic valve (AV) diseases, history of cardiac surgery and previous trauma.3 ,4 Although dilatation of the aorta (aortic aneurysms) increases the risk through greater wall stress, AAD can as well occur in patients with …
Contributors JB and OW have contributed substantially to conception and design of the paper. Drafting of the entire manuscript and designing of all tables and figures were performed by MS, JB, and OW revised the draft thoroughly. All authors approved of the final version of the manuscript and declare accountability for the entire content.
Funding Dr Silaschi's research post is funded by King's College Hospital Charity.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.