Statistics from Altmetric.com
Understand the physical principles and operational modalities of the various intravascular imaging techniques in clinical use.
Master the interpretation of images to distinguish various plaque components and morphologies.
Learn how and where to measure vessel diameters, areas and derived indices.
Update on key publications evaluating clinical application of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), especially in the setting of stent implantation.
Know the approved indications for IVUS and OCT use on the basis of current guidelines.
Two intracoronary imaging techniques are routinely available to complement angiography in the management of coronary artery disease, namely intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). The former has been in clinical use for >25 years and has directly informed the fundamentals of atherosclerotic plaque composition and arterial remodelling, as well as contemporary optimal stent implantation technique.1 ,2 The latter, introduced 10 years ago, has only been more widely adopted with the development of the frequency domain (FD)-OCT imaging, which enables complete image acquisition over a 6–10 cm segment during a 3–5 s pullback period obtaining blood clearance with the pressure injection of iodinated contrast or other crystalloids. Although OCT may be limited when visualising the full thickness of atherosclerotic plaques as a result of low penetration power, it however allows for measurements on a micron scale due to the high resolution of light.3 ,4 IVUS has greater penetration and, with the exception of dense calcific plaques, is able to display the media-to-media diameter, an important measurement to evaluate remodelling and guide vessel expansion during angioplasty.5 Both IVUS and OCT are superior to angiography for quantification of vessel dimension and thus critically helpful in guiding coronary angioplasty (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) and stent implantation.6–11 Greyscale IVUS can be augmented by implementation of virtual histology (VH), which offers qualitative information on …
Twitter Follow Alfredo Redondo Diéguez @Alfredo_Redondo
Contributors AG and CDM planned and drafted the first manuscript. AG, IDK, ARD and GL took part in the selection and elaboration of images as well as in table preparation. IV, NP, RK, RDS and CDM revised the text and offered important feedback based on their practical experience in the field. ARD, CDM and RDS edited the final version. All the authors have contributed to and approved this final version.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.