Article Text

Download PDFPDF
55 Quality of life is similar in patients with chronic stable heart failure on either vasodilating or non-vasodilating beta blockers. modified kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire
  1. R Pharithi,
  2. E Egom,
  3. A Maher,
  4. S Fall,
  5. S Fahy,
  6. A Jago,
  7. T Mannion,
  8. L Delaney,
  9. B Khan,
  10. I Yearoo,
  11. C Murphy,
  12. V Maher
  1. Heart Efficiency Clinic, Cardiology Department, AMNCH Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland


Background Beta-blockers with additional nitric oxide-mediated vasodilating properties are beneficial in patients with heart failure but its unknown if they are better than non-vasodilating Beta blockers.

Aim To compare quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure stabilised on vasodilating and non-vasodilating beta-blockers.

Methods and Results 163 patients having chronic stable heart failure for at least 6 months were evaluated according to their treatment with vasodilating or non-vasodilating betablockers. Modified Kansa city cardiomyopathy score was used to assess quality of life. Table 1 summarises patient characteristics, comorbidities and parameters of quality of life in both groups.

Abstract 55 Table 1 Patient characteristics, comorbidities and parameters of quality of life

Conclusion There was no difference in the quality of life of patients on vasodilating and non-vasodilating beta-blockers. While vasodilation should improve quality of life, the lack of difference in our study may reflect that patients may already have maximal vasodilation due to their other therapeutic agents such as ACE or ARBs. This indicates that beta blocker choice is not essential in otherwise optimally treated patients.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.