You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 104, Issue 14
  • Response to: ‘Contemporary management and outcomes in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries’ by Kutty et al

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Correspondence
Response to: ‘Contemporary management and outcomes in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries’ by Kutty et al
  1. Magdalena Lipczynska1,
  2. Ewa Kowalik2,
  3. Anna Klisiewicz3,
  4. Piotr Marian Hoffman4,
  5. Piotr Szymanski5
  1. 1Department of Congenital Cardiac Defects, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
  2. 2Congenital Cardiac Defects, Instytut Kardiologii im Prymasa Tysiaclecia Stefana Kardynala Wyszynskiego, Warszawa, Poland
  3. 3Institute for Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
  4. 4Congenital Heart Disease for Adults, Instytut Kardiologii Warszawa Poland, Warsaw, Poland
  5. 5Department of Valvular Heart Disease, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Magdalena Lipczynska, Department of Congenital Cardiac Defects, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw 04-628, Poland; mlipczynska{at}ikard.pl

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313281

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    To the Editor We read, with great interest, the recent review of contemporary management and outcomes in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) by Kutty et al.1 The authors mainly focused on surgical management of ccTGA, nearly omitting pharmacotherapy and general prevention strategies. However, in our experience, pharmacotherapy is effective in properly selected patients …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors All authors participated in conception, design of the work and drafting the letter.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles