Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
The authors’ reply to the letter from Kerkhof et al entitled ‘The importance of (measuring) the end-systolic volume index in predicting survival’
  1. David L Prior1,2,
  2. Susanna R Stevens3,
  3. Hussain R Al-Khalidi3,
  4. Thomas A Holly4,
  5. Daniel S Berman5
  6. on behalf of the STICH Investigators
  1. 1 Department of Cardiology, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  4. 4 Department of Medicine-Cardiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  5. 5 Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr David L Prior, Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, PO Box 2900, Fitzroy, Australia; david.prior{at}svha.org.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank Kerkhof et al 1 for their interest in our paper2 and are pleased they agree with our conclusion that accurate determination of end-systolic volume index (ESVI) is important in patients with reduced LVEF.

  1. Table 3 and figure 2 show the entire range of ESVI values. The scatter plot of the individual data points (figure 2) and summary statistics presented in table 3 reveal the data are highly skewed to the right such that most values fall at the lower end of …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors have contributed to the content of the reply and have consented to its submission.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.