Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Many adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) present with end-stage disease, at a point where intervention is risky and might be futile, because the diagnosis is missed earlier in the disease course. Given the increasing prevalence of AS in our ageing populations and the effectiveness of transcatheter valve implantation for treatment of this highly mortal disease, accurate early diagnosis is increasingly important. Physicians and patients have faith that the stethoscope is an adequate approach to diagnosis of valve disease; indeed, the stethoscope is the symbol of a doctor. Yet, numerous studies have shown that cardiac auscultation is inaccurate for diagnosing the presence or severity of valve disease, regardless of training and experience. We find it difficult to acknowledge that the sounds generated by the heart, no matter how carefully listened to or recorded, simply are not a reliable reflection of the presence or severity of valve disease.
In this issue of Heart, Gardezi and colleagues1 evaluated the accuracy of cardiac auscultation by experienced general practitioners in 251 adults over age 65 years undergoing echocardiography. Overall, 68% of patients had a new diagnosis of mild valvular heart disease (VHD) and 14% had significant VHD as defined by echocardiographic findings. The sensitivity of cardiac auscultation was very low, even for significant VHD (44%) with likelihood ratios that were not statistically significant (table 1).
Why are physicians so reluctant to admit that cardiac auscultation is no longer an adequate approach to diagnosis of valve disease? Certainly, we still should listen to our patients—both with a careful medical history and with our stethoscopes—because auscultation remains useful for many other conditions, such as heart failure. In addition, the thrill of hearing a murmur and deducing the underlying lesion will remain a rite of transition for all medical trainees. However, perhaps it is time to consider screening older adults with echocardiography for VHD, especially given the increasing availability of low-cost point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) devices. My view is that “Now is the time to start teaching POCUS to healthcare providers. The diagnosis of heart valve disease is missed in too many patients. We need to ‘mind the gap’ by putting our stethoscopes back in our pockets and taking out our ultrasound transducers.”2
Another vexing issue in adults with AS is recognising symptom onset. Many older adults have symptoms of decreased exercise tolerance, dyspnoea, dizziness or chest pain that may or may not be related to aortic valve obstruction. In addition, because symptom onset is insidious, patients often do not recognise a gradual limitation as a ‘symptom’ and thus do not report these changes to their physician. In a retrospective cohort study of 316 older adults with apparently asymptomatic moderate to severe AS, Saeed and colleagues3 found that 29% had symptoms on exercise testing at baseline. Their outcome data confirm that symptoms provoked by exercise testing indicate the patient is symptomatic with a 24-month event-free survival of only 46%±4% in those with symptoms on stress testing compared with 70%±4% in those who remained asymptomatic (p<0.0001) (figure 1).
Bicuspid aortic valve disease is present in 15%–30% of women and girls with Turner syndrome (TS). In addition, TS is associated with a risk of aortic dissection 20–100 times higher than women without TS (figure 2). Mortensen and colleagues4 provide an excellent review article on cardiovascular imaging in patients with TS, detailing recommendations for screening and follow-up of these high-risk patients. Periodic imaging is recommended in women and girls with TS, even in the absence of other risk factors and even when baseline aortic size appears to be normal (figure 3).
The Education in Heart article5 in this issue discusses the principles of managing patients with VHD who are undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Management starts with an accurate diagnosis of the severity of VHD, usually by echocardiography, along with assessment of surgical risk. During the procedure, invasive haemodynamic monitoring and optimisation of loading conditions by an experienced anaesthetist is essential with addition specific recommendation for each type of valve lesion. Postoperatively, continued close monitoring with rapid intervention for hypotension, electrolyte imbalances or arrhythmias is recommended.
You can then test your knowledge with the Image Challenge case6 which presents an 82-year-old man with a systolic murmur undergoing preoperative evaluation for non-cardiac surgery. The Doppler tracings show an interesting finding that impacted patient care.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.