Article Text

Download PDFPDF
66 Acute coronary syndrome in type 2 diabetes treated using SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors: a comparative network meta-analysis of 127,731 individuals
  1. Sean Zheng1,
  2. Alistair Roddick2
  1. 1Royal Brompton Hospital
  2. 2King’s College London


Background Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are the three latest drug classes to receive regulatory approval for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Although pharmacological treatment with these agents improves glycaemic control, macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes remains a considerable clinical challenge. While there have been several cardiovascular outcome trials using these drug classes, there have been no head-to-head clinical outcome trials and their comparative efficacies for cardiovascular endpoints remains unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the comparative efficacy of SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome.

Methods MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and published meta-analyses through October 11, 2017 were searched. Randomised controlled trials included for meta-analysis were required to enrol participants with type 2 diabetes and a follow-up of at least 12 weeks, where SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors were compared with either each other, placebo or unblinded control.Outcomes were myocardial infarction (any and non-fatal events), and unstable angina. Random-effects frequentist network meta-analysis was used for indirect comparisons. P-score statistic was used to determine probability of individual drug type being best in class.

Results There were 108 comparisons totalling 1 27 731 participants (figure 1). Only SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced all MI when compared with control (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99, p=0.032) (figure 2). There were no effects with GLP-1 agonists (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.03, p=0.19) or DPP-4 inhibitors (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.04, p=0.22) compared with control. There was no difference between drug classes. Similar results were seen for non-fatal MI. No drug class had any effect on unstable angina. SGLT-2 inhibitors were most likely to rank highest for efficacy for all outcomes (figure 2).

Conclusion When compared with control treatment, SGLT-2 inhibitors were the only drug class to reduce myocardial infarction and were most likely to be the most efficacious. There have been no head-to-head cardiovascular outcome-driven RCTs comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors with incretin-based therapies. Without any such trials on the horizon, network-meta analysis is the only Method to provide comparative estimates between these agents. This study supports the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors for the reduction of acute coronary syndrome events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

  • Diabetes
  • Acute coronary syndrome

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.