You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Response to ‘Pregnancy in women with pre-existent ischaemic heart disease’
  1. Matthew Cauldwell,
  2. Phil Steer,
  3. Mark R Johnson
  1. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew Cauldwell, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Imperial College London, London SW10 9NH, UK; mrc100{at}ic.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315032

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The authors’ reply

    We enjoyed Lameijer et al’s timely systematic review of the maternal cardiovascular and fetal outcomes of pregnancy in women with a history of ischaemic heart disease (IHD).1 Their study highlights that to date there are relatively few data, with the single largest study only including 50 pregnancies,2 in which there was an overall 10% risk of adverse cardiovascular event. However, we have several concerns regarding …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.