Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Renal denervation therapy for hypertension: still on trial
  1. Iain McGregor MacIntyre,
  2. David John Webb
  1. Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor David John Webb, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; d.j.webb{at}ed.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Hypertension remains the leading risk factor for death and disability worldwide1 and affects one in three adults in the UK. Despite current management, primarily focusing on lifestyle modification and pharmacological therapies, up to a third of patients do not reach current blood pressure (BP) targets. Treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH: defined as having a BP above goal despite concurrent use of three antihypertensive agents of different classes, one of which should be a diuretic) is common, affecting around 6%–8% of people with treated hypertension in the UK.2 The reasons for treatment failure are wide ranging but poor adherence is a very major factor.3 For this reason, a once-only therapy to reduce BP in the long term is a very attractive option.

Renal denervation (RDN), as a treatment for hypertension, initially gained traction early this century. It is based on a sound pathophysiological understanding of hypertension and the role the sympathetic nervous system plays. Indeed, prior to the advent of modern antihypertensive therapies surgical sympathectomies were commonly used in the treatment of severe hypertension, although side effects were often intolerable.4 RDN differs from the earlier blunt approaches by directly targeting the renal sympathetic nerves, which are known to have an important role in regulating renal blood flow and sodium …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors IMM and DW contributed equally to this work.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Linked Articles

  • Review
    Melvin D Lobo Andrew S P Sharp Vikas Kapil Justin Davies Mark A de Belder Trevor Cleveland Clare Bent Neil Chapman Indranil Dasgupta Terry Levy Anthony Mathur Matthew Matson Manish Saxena Francesco P Cappuccio On behalf of the British & Irish Hypertension Society, the British Cardiovascular Society, the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society, the British Society of Interventional Radiology and Melvin D Lobo Andrew SP Sharp Vikas Kapil Justin Davies Mark A De belder Trevor Cleveland Clare Bent Neil Chapman Indranil Dasgupta Terry Levy Anthony Mathur Matthew Matson Manish Saxena Francesco P Cappuccio