Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Fixed dose combination (FDC) drugs are standard practice in the treatment of infectious diseases, but their role in chronic non-communicable diseases is unclear. FDC anti-hypertensive drugs are an attractive option to improve compliance by reducing the number of pills taken daily, particularly in elderly patients who generally require more than one drug to control blood pressure and often are on multiple other medications. However, there are concerns that FDC antihypertensives might increase the risk of medication errors, specifically therapeutic duplications resulting in potentially serious drug-drug interactions, compared with prescribing each component of the FDC separately.
In order to answer this question, Moriarty and colleagues1 retrospectively evaluated all primary healthcare prescriptions in Ireland for the 2015 year, using the Primary Care Reimbursement Services administrative pharmacy claims database. The primary outcome was therapeutic duplication, defined as the use of an anti-hypertensive drug of the same class in an FDC preparation and as a separate drug, prescribed at the same time. The secondary outcome was the presence of a potentially serious drug-drug interaction involving a component of an included antihypertensive FDC and another co-prescribed medication. From 307,833 FDC prescriptions and 1 51 632 separate component prescriptions for anti-hypertensive agents, therapeutic duplication was twice as likely with a FDC but still occurred in only 0.8% of patients, most often involving calcium channel blockers. The risk of a drug-drug interaction between medications prescribed a the same time (most often amlodipine and simvastatin) was about 10% but was no different for FDC compared with single component prescriptions.
The take-home message is that healthcare professionals or patients who use FDC anti-hypertensive medication should exercise caution and vigilance with these medications in order to minimise medication errors and patient harm. In the companion editorial, Webster2 considered these findings reassuring for high incomes settings, where FDCs are broadly available, considering the low duplication rates and absence of a higher risk of serious drug-drug interactions. She emphasises also that FDCs for chronic non-communicable diseases have a great potential to improve cardiovascular risk factors in low- and middle-income countries, where most of burden of chronic non-communicable diseases lies and where the availability of FDCs currently is limited.
Although the presence of a coronary artery chronic total occlusion (CTO) is associated with a higher rate of adverse cardiac events in patients after myocardial infarction or with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), the significance of a CTO identified on coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patents with no prior history of CAD is unclear. In a registry of over 22 thousand patients without known CAD with follow-up data for a median of 26 months, a CTO was present in only 1% of patients.3 The mortality rate for CTO patients was no different than the 20% of patients with moderate-severe CAD (22.95; 95% CI 12.71 to 41.45 vs 14.46; 95% CI 12.34 to 16.94; P=0.163) but was higher than patients with nonobstructive CAD or normal coronary arteries. However, patients with a CTO had higher event rates than those with moderate-severe CAD, mainly due to a higher rate of later revascularisation (figure 1).
In the accompanying editorial, Azevedo and Bittencourt4 emphasise that patients referred for a CCTA for suspected CAD who are found to have a CTO have a different risk profile and prognosis compared with symptomatic patients with a CTO in the setting of known coronary disease or prior infarction. ‘Thus, instead of an automatic incorporation of the current practice approach to the treatment of patients with CTO, the population coming from coronary CTA evaluation might benefit from a more selective use of revascularisation procedures.’
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasing problem with our ageing population but there have been few studies on whether risk factors for AF are the same in women as in men. Using data on over 15 thousand participants in the Scottish Heart Health Extended Cohort, Peters and Woodward5 found that relationships were similar in men and women for risk of AF related to older age, lower socioeconomic status, taller stature, increased systolic blood pressure and higher C-reactive protein levels. However, body mass index was a stronger risk factor for AF in men than in women. For women, the strongest risk factors were elevated NT-pro-BNP, uric acid (a surrogate marker of oxidative stress) and cystatin-C (a marker of renal function) levels. (figure 2)
In the discussion, the authors note that these observations are important for several reasons including insights into the aetiology of AF that might translate into new treatment targets, more accurate projections of the future burden of AF allowing better allocation of healthcare resources, and improved sex-specific risk scores for identifying patients at risk of AF.
The Education in Heart article in this issue6 reviews the current indications and contraindication to cardiac transplantation, summarises the clinical evaluation prior to listing for transplantation and discusses the long-term outcomes and complications after heart transplantation. Although the number of cardiac transplantations in the UK remains relatively low, there were over 3000 heart transplants annually in the USA in 2016 with increasing numbers each year and longer survival times after transplantation. Thus, every cardiologist should be aware of the issues involved in managing these patients and, most importantly, which patients should be referred to a specialist centre for consideration of heart transplantation.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.