Article Text

PDF
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed surgical valves
  1. Matheus Simonato1,
  2. Danny Dvir2
  1. 1 Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  2. 2 Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
  1. Correspondence to Dr Danny Dvir, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195-6422, USA; danny.dvir{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Aortic valve-in-valve is a less invasive alternative to surgical redo in the treatment of failed bioprosthetic valves. While only inoperable patients underwent the procedure before, operators currently offer it to those at lower risk and worldwide experience is in the thousands. Early mortality has diminished in recent analyses and improvements in symptoms and quality of life have been documented. Main considerations with aortic valve-in-valve include elevated postprocedural gradients, coronary obstruction and leaflet thrombosis. Risk factors for each of these adverse events have been described at length. Aortic valve-in-valve offers a safe and effective option in the management of failed bioprosthetic valves.

  • bicuspid aortic valve
  • transcatheter valve interventions

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.