Statistics from Altmetric.com
How to diagnose chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
How to decide on best interventional strategy—pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) versus balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA).
Understanding the techniques, efficacy and safety of PEA and BPA.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) occurs due to persistent pulmonary obstruction and vasculopathy after an acute pulmonary embolism and is underdiagnosed. Patients experience breathlessness and symptoms and signs of right heart failure and without treatment the prognosis is poor. Available interventional approaches include pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), as well as pulmonary hypertension-targeted drug therapy. The choice of treatment depends on anatomical, haemodynamic and patient factors and is determined multidisciplinary team assessment. This review will cover the assessment and treatment of CTEPH with a particular focus on PEA and BPA, as well as highlighting future therapeutic directions.
CTEPH is a condition caused by failure of resolution of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and results in fibrotic tissue deposition and altered vascular remodelling that occludes the pulmonary arteries.1 It has been estimated that between 0.56% and 3% of acute PE develop CTEPH2 resulting in an incidence of 0.9–5.7 cases per million and a prevalence of 8–40 cases per million, although this is likely to be an underestimate as the condition is often under-reported.3 4 Mechanical obstructions and secondary pulmonary vasculopathy cause pulmonary hypertension (PH), right ventricular remodelling and dilatation culminating in breathlessness, a worsening exercise tolerance, presyncope and fatigue that is progressively fatal due to right heart failure.5
Diagnosis of CTEPH
CTEPH is diagnosed in patients with persistent symptoms of breathlessness, evidence of PH at rest (newly defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) >20 mm Hg (rather than >25 mm Hg) in combination with pulmonary arterial wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) ≥3 Wood units (WU)) and imaging suggestive of thromboembolic pulmonary obstruction following 3 …
Contributors SPH and DJ reviewed the literature, wrote and edited the manuscript and are equal contributors. SPH is the guarantor of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work
Author note References which include a * are considered to be key references
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.