Download PDFPDF
Original research
Exclusion versus preservation of the left atrial appendage in rheumatic mitral valve surgery
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Incomplete surgical left atrial appendage closure increases thromboembolic complications in a patient with rheumatic mitral valve disease
    • Ahmet Güner, Cardiologist Department of Cardiology, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
    • Other Contributors:
      • Ezgi Gültekin Güner, Cardiologist
      • Macit Kalçık, Cardiologist
      • Mehmet Özkan, Cardiologist

    To the Editor,
    We have recently read with great interest the article by Kim et al entitled ‘‘Exclusion versus preservation of the left atrial appendage in rheumatic mitral valve surgery’’ [1]. We appreciate the authors for their study describing the relationship of preservation of the left atrial appendage (LAA) to the risk of adverse clinical events in patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. On the other hand, we believe that there are several major drawbacks that need to be addressed.
    First of all, the LAA can be excluded from the systemic circula¬tion by obliterating its orifice with or without excising the body of the appendage [2]. During the two decades, mechanical occlusion of the LAA including the surgical approach has been adopted by clinicians as a potential approach for stroke prevention in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) [2]. Surgical LAA ligation has been attempted with or without enabling devices. Although routine surgical LAA occlusion has been recommended by some, the evidence base for its actual benefit remains limited and conflicting. Surgical closure particularly using suture ligation can yield incomplete surgical left atrial appendage closure (iSLC) in more than one-third of the patients [2, 3]. Previously, Katz et al evaluated 50 patients who underwent surgical LAA closure in association with mitral valve surgery and similarly reported iSLC in 36% of their patients [3]. The readers may wonder whether routine p...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.