Article Text

Download PDFPDF

113 Potential role of coronary physiology in treating ‘bystander’ disease in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  1. Matthew Knight,
  2. Vignesh Rammohan,
  3. Arfah Preston,
  4. Gareth Williams,
  5. Mina Ghobrial,
  6. Abdulaziz Al Baraikan,
  7. Rebecca Gosling,
  8. Paul Morris,
  9. Patricia Lawford,
  10. Rodney Hose,
  11. Robert F Storey,
  12. Julian Gunn
  1. Department of Infection Immunity and Cardiovascular disease, University of Sheffield


Background Many patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in other coronary arteries, for which optimal management is uncertain. In the COMPLETE trial, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of eligible NCLs (vessel diameter ≥2.5mm) improved hard clinical outcomes, compared with conservative treatment. However, 99.3% of NCLs were assessed by visualisation of the angiogram using a threshold of ≥70% stenosis, which is an inaccurate method for assessing haemodynamic significance. A pressure wire was used to assess physiological significance (FFR ≤0.80) in only 0.7% of NCLs that visually had 50-69% stenosis.

Hypothesis: In the ‘real-world’, the proportion of STEMI patients with NCL stenoses ≥50% that are of physiological significance, based upon fractional flow reserve (FFR) estimation, is low.

Methods The angiograms of consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were retrospectively reviewed by an interventional cardiologist to identify cases that either had NCL stenoses of 50-69% that would have been eligible for COMPLETE if FFR was ≤0.80 or fulfilled the COMPLETE eligibility criteria by visual assessment (stenosis ≥70%). The virtual FFRs of NCLs were computed using the VIRTUheart™ tool. The primary outcome was the proportion of all ‘real world’ STEMI patients with NCL stenoses ≥50%. Secondary outcomes were a) the proportion of patients with NCL stenoses of 50-69% who had vFFR ≤0.80 (‘FFR-guided PCI’ group; b) the proportion of NCL stenoses of >70% with a virtual FFR ≤0.80 (‘PCI without FFR’ group).

Results Angiograms from 248 patients presenting with STEMI and undergoing primary PCI were reviewed. 70 cases (28%), were found with 86 NCLs that would have been potentially suitable for inclusion in COMPLETE (95% CI: 22.4% to 33.6%). Of these 70 cases, 59% of NCLs fell into the ‘FFR-guidance’ (50-69% stenosis) group and 41% into the ‘PCI without FFR’ (≥70% stenosis) group. Of the

Abstract 113 Figure 1 (Left) Angiogram of right coronary artery in a patient with STEMI affecting the left coronary artery. There is a proximal bystander lesion in the right coronary artery (arrow). (Right) using VIRTUhear/TM the bystander lesion is modelled, and then computational fluid dynamics are used to compute the ‘virtual’ FFR

70, 49 angiograms (70%) were technically suitable for modelling. A positive vFFR was found in 47% of NCLs (95% CI: 33.7% to 60.6%) (see Table 1).

Abstract 113 Table 1 Breakdown of haemodynamic significance (vFFR ≤0.8) for NCLs successfully modelled using VIRTUheart™ in each management group, ‘virtual’ Fractional flow reserve= vFFR,
Abstract 113 Table 2 Number of lesions suitable for pressure wire in COMPLETE and Sheffield populations

Conclusion In a ‘real-world’ STEMI population, 28% of patients could be considered for either FFR assessment (NCL stenosis 50-69%) or PCI without FFR according to the COMPLETE study criteria. However, of those, nearly 60% should undergo physiological assessment, according to COMPLETE eligibility criteria, even though very few were actually enrolled on this basis. Of the 60%, only 32% were physiologically significant; and, of all the NCLs, only 47% were physiologically significant. Further work is required to determine whether virtual FFR might provide a cost-effective means of identifying patients who will benefit from NCL revascularisation.

Conflict of Interest none

  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • Computed fractional flow reserve
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.