Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Pregnancy during cardiology training: a call to action
  1. Sarah M Birkhoelzer1,
  2. Francis J E Gardner2,
  3. Rebecca F Ortega3,
  4. Roxana Mehran4
  1. 1 Cardiology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
  2. 2 Gynaecology, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
  3. 3 Women as One, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
  4. 4 Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sarah M Birkhoelzer, Cardiology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, UK; Sarah.birkhoelzer{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

The pregnant cardiologist

In the UK, 28% of cardiology trainees and 13% of cardiologists post completion of training are women; in the USA they represent 20% and 12%, respectively.1 2 The years spent in training and early practice represent women’s prime childbearing years. Competing demands on female trainees might be the reason why many women do not choose cardiology.3 What, therefore, are effective ways to negotiate these issues and not lose talent in cardiology?

Concerns regarding pregnancy during cardiology training

During pregnancy, a wide spectrum of biological and psychological disturbances can impact on the individual’s clinical training performance. These include the impact of fertility treatment, pregnancy symptoms, radiation exposure during pregnancy, shift work, securing maternity leave and childcare (figure 1). Due to the limited number of women in cardiology, those who are pregnant may also feel isolated and unsupported, particularly if they have experienced miscarriages or required fertility treatment.

Figure 1

Concerns of the pregnant cardiologist.

It is important to raise awareness about fertility issues and pregnancy complications which are prevalent among cardiologists (miscarriage, pre-term delivery, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes) and often lead to the use of assisted reproductive technology.4 …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @birkhoelzerS

  • Contributors All authors equally devised the manuscript, created and revised drafts, performed independent literature reviews and agreed on the content of the finalised and revised manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.