Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Coronary artery calcium paradox and physical activity
  1. Gaurav S Gulsin1,2,
  2. Alastair James Moss1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  2. 2 Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia and St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alastair James Moss, Department of Cardiovascular Science, University of Leicester and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK; ajm136{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Reducing the risk of plaque rupture events in individuals without a prior myocardial infarction is an imprecise science. To help clarify whether there is evidence of coronary artery disease and avoid ‘medicalisation’ of otherwise healthy individuals, international guidelines recommend incorporating the measurement of coronary artery calcium alongside risk prediction models.1 Coronary artery calcium serves as a surrogate marker of advanced calcified atherosclerosis and can be calculated from a non-contrast ECG-gated CT scan where a score of 1–99 Agatston units represents subclinical atherosclerosis, and a score of 100 or more Agatston units is considered an appropriate threshold for initiating medical therapy.1 At ≥100 Agatston units, the burden of advanced calcified atherosclerosis justifies statin implementation and this has been validated in a real-world cohort study of 16 996 subjects with a 10-year number needed to treat to prevent one cardiovascular event of 12.2 Many clinicians have advocated the benefits of coronary artery calcium in redefining the cardiovascular risk assessment of healthy individuals, as there is a strong link between high burdens of coronary artery calcium, accelerated progression of calcified plaque and the risk of future myocardial infarction. However, if the burden of calcified plaque is an accurate barometer of cardiovascular risk, one would expect an intervention which reduces an individual’s cardiovascular risk to attenuate progression of calcified plaque. And herein lies the coronary artery calcium paradox; both invasive and non-invasive imaging studies have …

View Full Text


  • Contributors GSG and AJM conceived and wrote the manuscript.

  • Funding The British Heart Foundation provides funding support for GSG (FS/16/47/32190, PG/07/068/2334) and AJM (AA/18/3/34220).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles