Statistics from Altmetric.com
In recent years, there has been increasing evidence of sex-related disparities in diagnostic investigations, medical therapies, referrals for invasive care as well as health services, and outcomes across a range of cardiovascular conditions.1–3 While several factors including sex-specific differences in age, physiological differences and comorbidities might contribute to these differences, adjusting for these variables often leaves sex as an independent predictor of treatments as well as outcomes; women are underdiagnosed, under referred and undertreated, and suffer worse outcomes across several cardiovascular conditions.
Relatively little is known about sex differences in clinical profile, surgical referrals and outcomes in infective endocarditis (IE). IE appears to occur in men more commonly than women, with sex differences in the microbial profile, aetiology and comorbidities of patients with IE.4–6 Some of these differences may translate to differences in outcomes, but evidence in this regard has varied.
The decision around both the receipt of surgical intervention and its timing in IE is complex and depends on many factors (figure 1), which include the size of the vegetation, the nature of the infective organism, the presence of paravalvular infection particularly with evidence of heart block or annular/periaortic abscesses, embolic phenomena, presentation with valve dysfunction resulting in symptoms or signs of heart failure, patient age, comorbidities and overall surgical risk, but importantly should not include sex per se.7 It is recommended by international guidelines that decisions around both the indication and timing …
Twitter @hvanspall, @MMamas1973
Contributors HGCVS produced the first draft of the editorial. MM produced the figure. IJ and MM edited for important intellectual content.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.