Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Use of intracoronary imaging to guide optimal percutaneous coronary intervention procedures and outcomes
  1. Gary S Mintz1,
  2. Ziad Ali1,2,
  3. Akiko Maehara1,2
  1. 1 Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York, USA
  2. 2 Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gary S Mintz, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 10019, New York, New York, USA; gmintz{at}crf.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Learning objectives

  • To understand the differences among intravascular imaging devices.

  • To understand how and when to use (and when not to use) available intravascular imaging devices.

  • To understand what is meant by stent optimisation and how it improves patient outcomes.

Introduction

Although it is the tool used by most interventional cardiologists to assess the severity of coronary artery disease and guide treatment, coronary angiography has many limitations because it is a lumenogram depicting shadowgraph, planar projections of the contrast-filled lumen that are often foreshortened rather than imaging the diseased vessel itself. Intravascular imaging (IVI)—first intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and recently optical coherence tomography (OCT) and near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and even combined modalities that are now available—provides tomographic or cross-sectional images of the coronary arteries. These techniques aid in physician decision-making, selection of treatment strategies, stent optimisation and answering questions that arise during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Randomised controlled trials, registries and meta-analyses consistently support procedural and long-term benefits of IVI-guided PCI especially drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.

IVUS versus OCT

An IVUS image is formed when ultrasound bounces off the layers of the artery and returns to the transducer that both emits and receives the ultrasound. There are two types of IVUS: (1) mechanical and (2) synthetic aperture array. The mechanical catheter has a single transducer mounted at the tip of a flexible drive shaft that is rotated and advanced or withdrawn within a stationary, short-monorail imaging sheath to scan the artery; current mechanical transducer frequencies range from 40 MHz to 60 MHz. The 20 mHz synthetic aperture array catheter has multiple, tiny transducer elements permanently affixed around the circumference of the catheter tip; they are fired sequentially to produce cross-sectional images, and the entire catheter must be withdrawn or advanced to scan the vessel. The synthetic aperture array has the lowest transducer frequency and temporal and …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors GSM wrote the manuscript. ZA and AM made critical revisions and/or provided panels for the figures.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests AM received grant support from Abbott Vascular and Boston Scientific, consultant for Conavi Medical Inc. GSM reports honoraria from Boston Scientific, Philips, and Terumo. ZA received institutional research grants to Columbia University, Abbott, Cardiovascular Systems Inc; consultant of Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Opsens, AstraZeneca.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Author note Some of the content of this review has been adapted from other reviews on this same topic including 'Mintz GS, Guagliumi G. Intravascular Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. Lancet 2017;390:793–809'. References which include a * are considered to be key references

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.