Article Text

Download PDFPDF

12 Clinical outcomes up to 10 years of asymptomatic incidental aortic dissections and large aortic aneurysms detected on computer tomography (CTA) prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
  1. Joon Tan,
  2. Tsu Kuan Teoh,
  3. Joanna Fong,
  4. Asthika Amirthalingam,
  5. Kamran Baig
  1. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK


Introduction Computer Tomography Aortography (CTA) is performed routinely to aid planning of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Incidental findings are common, and may influence the decision to proceed with TAVI. The safety and long term outcomes of performing TAVI in patients with previously undiagnosed incidental CT findings of aortic dissections and large aortic aneurysms is currently unknown. We sought to establish the frequency of incidental aortic dissections and large aortic aneurysms prior to TAVI, and subsequent clinical outcomes of patients.

Methods This was a retrospective study of 628 sequential TAVI patients in a large, UK tertiary centre between January 2010 and September 2020. Patients were evaluated in 3 groups as per pre-TAVI CTA: incidental aortic dissections, aortic aneurysm >4cm and all others (control group). Endpoints were procedural success, peri-procedural major bleeding and/or vascular complications and/or CVA, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Results 2.9% of patients (n=18) had incidental aortic dissection, of which 66.7%(n=12) were male, with a mean age of 86.7±4.4. 3.8% of patients (n=24) had aortic aneurysms >4cm. 83.3%(n=20) of them were male and the mean age was 82.8±5.4. 5.6% (n=1) of the patients with incidental aortic dissection had severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to 4.2% (n=1) of the patients in the aortic aneurysms group. Transfemoral approach was favoured in 77.8% of patients in the dissection group and 83.3% of patients in the aneurysm group versus 93.3% in the control group. A summary of procedural characteristics is summarised in table 1. Vascular access complications, stroke, bleeding and length of hospital stay were comparable between all 3 groups (table 2). Patients with dissection and large aneurysm had a lower success rate of valve implantation (88.9% and 87.5% vs 97.1%, p=0.01). 30-day mortality in the dissection group was higher than the other 2 groups (21.1% vs 0% and 5.6%, p=0.004). Log-rank analysis revealed a higher incidence of MACE in the dissection group over 24 months compared to the other two groups (figure 1).

Abstract 12 Figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curve

Abstract 12 Table 1

Baseline patient and procedural characteristics (n=628)

Abstract 12 Table 2

Clinical outcomes and mortality

Conclusion A transfemoral approach appears to be a safe choice in patients with incidental findings of aortic dissection or aortic aneurysms >4cm. However, patients with stable previous aortic dissections have a significantly higher 30-day mortality and overall lower survival rate over 24 months. This important observation needs to be further investigated in a larger-scale, long-term follow up study, and may in future influence TAVI treatment planning.

Conflict of Interest None

  • Aortic dissection
  • Aortic aneurysm
  • TAVI

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.