Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is diastolic dysfunction a red flag sign in moderate aortic stenosis?
  1. Kenya Kusunose
  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kenya Kusunose, Department of Cardiovascular medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan; kusunosek{at}tokushima-u.ac.jp

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

With rapidly ageing population, aortic stenosis (AS) has become one of the most common valvular heart diseases. Severe AS is clearly associated with increased mortality, and the current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines designate a class I or IIa indication for aortic valve surgery in severe patients with AS with symptoms or with low left ventricular (LV) function.1 Historically, based on the lower risk of sudden death in moderate AS compared with severe AS, watchful observation was recommended to patients with moderate AS. In the last decade, prognostic findings on moderate AS have been gathered (table 1).2–4 A large echocardiographic national database study, including 3315 moderate AS with various LV systolic functions, suggested a poor survival rate (5-year mortality: 56%).4 Recently, two academic institutional databases, including 1245 moderate AS, also showed poor prognosis during follow-up (median follow-up: 4.3 years; mortality: 45.3%).3

View this table:
Table 1

Prognosis of moderate aortic stenosis

From a physiological viewpoint, narrowing of the aortic valve area leads to LV systolic/diastolic dysfunction due to LV pressure overloading. In patients with severe AS who particularly underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), diastolic dysfunction (DD) has been described as an early marker of myocardial damage and an important prognostic information. Thaden et al 5 reported an association between echocardiographic data and outcomes from a retrospective single-centre study. Over a mean follow-up period of 7.3 years, increased left atrial pressure based on the American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria remained an independent predictor of mortality after successful aortic valve replacement …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors KK is the sole author of this editorial.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Valvular heart disease
    Jan Stassen See Hooi Ewe Steele C Butcher Mohammed R Amanullah Bart J Mertens Kensuke Hirasawa Gurpreet K Singh Kenny Y Sin Zee Pin Ding Stephan M Pio Ching-Hui Sia Nicholas Chew William Kong Kian Keong Poh David Cohen Philippe Généreux Martin B Leon Nina Ajmone Marsan Victoria Delgado Jeroen J Bax