Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original research
Comparisons between biopsy-proven versus clinically diagnosed cardiac sarcoidosis
  1. Takeshi Kitai1,2,
  2. Takeru Nabeta3,
  3. Yoshihisa Naruse4,
  4. Tatsunori Taniguchi5,
  5. Kenji Yoshioka6,
  6. Chisato Miyakoshi7,
  7. Shinichi Kurashima1,
  8. Yutaro Miyoshi2,8,
  9. Hidekazu Tanaka9,
  10. Takahiro Okumura10,
  11. Yuichi Baba11,
  12. Yutaka Furukawa2,
  13. Yuya Matsue12,
  14. Chisato Izumi1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan
  2. 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  3. 3 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
  4. 4 Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine III, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
  5. 5 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
  6. 6 Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan
  7. 7 Department of Research Support, Center for Clinical Research and Innovation, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  8. 8 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
  9. 9 Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  10. 10 Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
  11. 11 Department of Cardiology and Geriatrics, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
  12. 12 Department of Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Takeshi Kitai, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka 564-8565, Japan; t-kitai{at}kcho.jp

Abstract

Objectives Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) without histological evidence remains controversial. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of histologically proven versus clinically diagnosed cases of CS, which were adjudicated using Heart Rhythm Society or Japanese Circulation Society criteria.

Methods A total of 512 patients with CS (age: 62±11 years, female: 64.3%) enrolled in the multicentre registry were studied. Histologically confirmed patients were classified as ‘biopsy-proven CS’, while those with the presence of strongly suggestive clinical findings of CS without histological evidence were classified as ‘clinical CS’. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalisation and ventricular arrhythmia event.

Results In total, 314 patients (61.3%) were classified as biopsy-proven CS, while 198 (38.7%) were classified as clinical CS. Patients classified under clinical CS were associated with higher prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction, septal thinning, and positive findings in fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography or Gallium scintigraphy than those under biopsy-proven CS. During median follow-up of 43.7 (23.3–77.3) months, risk of primary outcome was comparable between the groups (adjusted HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.75, p=0.22). Similarly, the risks of primary outcome were comparable between patients with clinical isolated CS who did not have other organ/tissue involvement, and biopsy-proven isolated CS (adjusted HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.56 to 2.70, p=0.61).

Conclusions A substantial number of patients were diagnosed with clinical CS without confirmatory biopsy. Considering the worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the histological evidence, the diagnosis of clinical CS is justifiable if imaging findings suggestive of CS are observed.

  • heart failure
  • outcome assessment, health care
  • cardiomyopathies

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors All the authors had full access to all the data in the study. TK takes responsibility for the overall content as the guarantor. Concept and design—TK, TN, YN, TT and YMatsue. Acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data—all authors. Drafting of the manuscript—TK, CM, TN, YN, TT, YMatsue and CI. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content—TK, TN, YN, TT, HT, TO, YB, YF, YMatsue and CI. Statistical analysis—TK, CM and SK. Administrative, technical or material support—TK, SK, YMiyoshi, TN, YN, TT, YMatsue and CI. Supervision—YF and CI.

  • Funding ILLUMINATE-CS was partially supported by the Novartis Pharma Research Grants.

  • Competing interests HT is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Pfizer and Novartis International. TO received honoraria from Ono Yakuhin, Otsuka, Novartis and AstraZeneca, and research grants from Ono Yakuhin, Amgen Astellas, Pfizer, Alnylam and Alexion (not in connection with the submitted work). YM received an honorarium from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co and Novartis Japan. Other authors have nothing to declare.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.