You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 109, Issue 23
  • Response to: Correspondence on “Beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for Takotsubo syndrome recurrence: a network meta-analysis” by John E Madias

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Response to: Correspondence on “Beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for Takotsubo syndrome recurrence: a network meta-analysis” by John E Madias
  1. Francesco Santoro,
  2. Natale Daniele Brunetti
  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Natale Daniele Brunetti, Department of Medical & Surgical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Foggia, Foggia, Italy; nd.brunetti{at}unifg.it

https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323431

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The Authors' reply

    We read the letter from ‘John E Madias’ on our paper ‘Beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors for Takotsubo syndrome recurrence: a network meta-analysis,’1 which raised several interesting points. We could not but agree with quite all the remarks enlisted.

    In response, some additional points should be taken into further consideration. First, there are no data from randomised trials in Takotsubo syndrome (TTS); second, there is paucity of data on drug dose regimens at follow-up, and, third, patients receiving beta-blockers (BB) and/or renin–angiotensin …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors FS and NDB contributed to drafting a response to the correspondence letter.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles