Responses

Original research
Outcomes in patients treated with loop diuretics without a diagnosis of heart failure: a retrospective cohort study
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Diagnostic opportunities generated by a trial of loop diuretic treatment

    A trial of loop diuretic therapy in patients who have not received the benefit of evaluation either by echocardiography or by natriuretic peptide testing can be an opportunity to maximise alternative strategies for validating the diagnosis of congestive heart failure(CHF)
    The following are some of the alternative strategies:-
    (1)Evaluation of jugular venous pressure(JVP).
    This strategy was poorly maximised in the anecdotal report of two patients(patient 2 and patient 3) ,with peripheral oedema and breathlessness, in whom the initial cardiovascular examination was recorded as "normal". A subsequent repeat clinical examination revealed an extremely elevated JVP attributable to constrictive pericarditis[1].
    Documentation of body weight before and after a trial of loop diuretic treatment enhances the diagnostic value of evaluation of JVP. The rationale is that a JVP that is persistently high in spite of significant weight loss after diuretic use can be a powerful indicator of the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis[2]]
    (ii) Documentation of a fall in forced vital capacity(FVC) after a trial of loop diuretic treatment.
    In that context, a fall in body weight which is accompanied by a fall in FVC after a trial of loop diuretic treatment is indicative of a reversible restrictive ventilatory defect that is attributable to pulmonary congestion and, hence, CHF. Reversibility of FVC after loop diuretics is a well document...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.