Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A diagnostically challenging case of wide complex tachycardia
  1. Alexander P Hoffmann,
  2. Elliot J Stein,
  3. Neal A Chatterjee
  1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alexander P Hoffmann, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA; alhoff{at}uw.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Clinical introduction

A woman in her 60s with non-obstructive coronary artery disease, aortic valve replacement and aortic arch repair, chronic diastolic heart failure and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFL), presented with 3 days of sustained palpitations that felt similar to prior episodes of AF/AFL. She was euvolemic, haemodynamically stable, with a regular rhythm. Home medications included apixaban, carvedilol and flecainide. Presenting ECG (figure 1A) was compared with baseline ECG (figure 1B) and ECG from a recent admission for AF with rate-related aberrancy (figure 1C). There was no atrioventricular dissociation or fusion/capture beats. High-sensitivity troponin I was undetectable. Serum creatinine had fluctuated recently between 1.3 and 2.0 mg/dL from a baseline of 1.0 mg/dL (estimated glomerular filtration rate approximately 25–45 from a baseline of >60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Electrolytes …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @pnw_md

  • Contributors APH, EJS and NAC were involved in the diagnosis and treatment of the patient. APH led the conceptualisation, drafting and review of the manuscript. EJS and NAC contributed equally to the editing and review of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.