OBJECTIVE To determine the long term health related quality of life of coronary artery bypass graft patients, to look at changes between one and five years after surgery, and to examine the ability of preoperative variables to predict longer term outcome.
DESIGN Nottingham health profile (NHP) was used to assess patients at five years compared to results obtained at one year.
PATIENTS 100 male patients aged < 60 years at time of surgery; 77 had three vessel disease and 84 received three or more saphenous vein grafts.
RESULTS In comparing the five year results with those at one year, lower mean scores, indicating slight improvements, were seen in the NHP dimensions of pain, sleep, social isolation, and emotional reactions, whereas signs of deterioration were noted in the physical mobility and energy scores. Chest pain was experienced by 34 of 84 patients at five years compared with 17 of 89 patients at one year. The proportion of patients who were unrestricted in their activities ranged from 61–70% at five years compared with 82–88% at one year. Absence of dyspnoea before surgery, indicating relatively good left ventricular function, was a predictor of good outcome at both one and five years.
CONCLUSIONS Evidence of deterioration in physical function is compatible with expected decline in graft patency; specific rather than generic measures were most sensitive to this change.
- quality of life
- coronary artery bypass graft
- Nottingham health profile
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
This long term prospective study aimed to compare patients’ health related quality of life before and at intervals after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and to determine the ability of preoperative variables to predict outcome. The results from the questionnaires completed before and at three and 12 months after surgery are reported elsewhere.1 In summary, significant improvements were evident in general health status, symptoms, and activity at three months and one year after CABG surgery, compared to before surgery. Predictors of return to work and to unrestricted home activity, by one year after surgery, were working preoperatively, the length of time waiting for surgery, and the absence of breathlessness before operation. This paper reports on the changes between one and five years after surgery together with an analysis of any preoperative factors still influencing outcome at five years.
Patients and methods
The study population of 100 male patients had a mean (SD) age at time of surgery of 51 (6) years (range 37–59 years); 77 patients had three vessel disease and 84 received three or more bypass grafts. Bypass surgery was performed using the saphenous vein graft; only three patients received an internal mammary artery bypass graft in addition to the vein grafts. Emergency cases were excluded because of the need to establish baseline measures of health related quality of life before surgery. Three of the 100 patients received repeat graft surgery within five years of the original operation.
The questionnaires completed by patients were the Nottingham health profile (NHP),2 which is a generic measure of health status, and a study questionnaire containing sections on symptoms, working life, home, leisure, and social and sexual activities.
The NHP is in two parts. Part I contains 38 questions in the six dimensions of physical mobility, pain, energy, sleep, social isolation, and emotional reactions. From the yes/no replies, a score from 0 to 100 is calculated for each dimension, with higher scores indicating higher levels of dysfunction or distress. In part II of the NHP, patients indicate whether seven areas of daily living are affected by their state of health: work, home life, social life, home relationships, sex life, interests/hobbies, and holidays.
The study questionnaire contains sections on working life, symptoms, and activity. Patients indicated frequency of symptoms on a scale from “never” through “occasionally”, “some of the time”, “most of the time” to “always”. To assess the level of exertion at which problems occurred, patients with symptoms completed a scale from “rest”, through “walking slowly”, “walking normally”, “climbing stairs”, “running”, to “heavy lifting”. In measuring activity restrictions, patients rated the degree of restriction, caused by their health, on a scale from “no restriction” through “limited”, “severely limited” to “no activity” for relevant activities.
NHP part I scales are summarised using mean scores for comparisons with other studies and accepted norms. Scores are not normally distributed and changes between one and five years after surgery were assessed using Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test.
Categorical responses are expressed as the number of positive responses and the corresponding percentage of those returning questionnaires. Comparisons of the number of positive responses at one and five years after surgery were performed using the McNemar test. A small number who failed to complete one or five year questionnaires were excluded from this analysis. Resulting bias was considered by checking that the percentage of positive responses remained roughly the same.
To check for convergent validity of the measures used, the associations between work, symptoms, physical problems, and activities were assessed using the χ2 test for contingency tables. Associations between NHP part I scores and symptoms and activities were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
At five years following surgery, 84 of the 100 patients returned questionnaires. Of the missing 16, four were deceased, three were not traced, and nine failed to return questionnaires. These figures compare with 98 respondents before surgery, 91 at three months after surgery, and 89 at one year following surgery.
NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE
From part I of the NHP, mean scores at five years were compared with those before surgery and at one year following CABG (fig 1), with lower scores indicating better health status. In comparing the one and five year results, non-significant improvements can be seen in the dimensions of pain, sleep, social isolation, and emotional reactions, and non-significant deterioration was noted in the physical mobility and energy scores. When comparing the patients’ scores at five years with those from a general population sample,3 physical mobility, energy, and sleep scores were higher (table1).
From part II of the NHP, the percentage of patients who indicated that they were experiencing problems in daily activities, because of their current state of health, before and at one and five years after CABG surgery, are shown in fig 2. In comparing results at one and five years following surgery, small improvements were seen in working life and social life, home relationships, and holidays. The improvement in working life did not mean that more patients were working at five years, simply that fewer patients considered their state of health either to be a problem or to be relevant to their working life. There were slight increases in the number of patients indicating problems in sex life and hobbies, and no difference between the one and five year responses in looking after the home. None of these changes were significant.
At five years after CABG surgery 54 of 84 patients (64%) were working compared to 65 of 89 (73%) patients at one year after surgery and 49 of 98 (50%) before surgery. Of the 54 patients working at five years, 28 (52%) were in manual and 26 (48%) were in non-manual occupations. Compared with before surgery, 21 patients (25%) were doing a different job, nine (11%) had changed to lighter work, and four (5%) were working fewer hours.
Of the 28 patients (33%) not working at five years after surgery (two patients failed to indicate their work status), only four patients considered themselves fit to work, three said they were still planning to return to work, and 11 patients were retired. Thirteen patients (16%) had worked at some time since their operation; of these, two had worked for less than six months and 11 for longer than a year.
At five years after surgery, chest pain was a problem for 34 (40%) patients, of whom for 22 (65%) it occurred occasionally. Breathlessness was a problem for 50 (60%) patients, the frequency being occasional or some of the time for 34 of 50 (68%). This prevalence of symptoms at five years, compared with one year figures of 17 patients (19%) with chest pain and 29 (33%) with breathlessness, represented a significant difference (p < 0.001).
There was no difference in the levels of exertion which brought on symptoms at one and five years (fig 3).
Patients’ assessment of outcome
Patients were asked to give a general rating of their condition after surgery compared with before surgery, on a scale from “worse” to “completely better” (fig 4). Fewer patients said they were either “completely better” or “definitely improved” at five years compared to one year; there was an increase in those who rated their condition as “slightly improved” but no increase in those who were “no better” or “worse”.
The changes in home, leisure, and social activity restrictions, before surgery and at one and five years after surgery, are shown in table 2. The number of patients completing these sections reflect the proportion of the total respondents for whom these activities were relevant to their daily lives.
At five years, the proportion of patients reporting no restrictions in home activities, hobbies/interests, and social life had declined significantly (p = 0.01).
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS AND ACTIVITY
Our earlier findings relating return to work to the prevalence of breathlessness and chest pain in CABG patients at one year1 are confirmed by the figures at five years after surgery. Of those 28 patients not working at five years, 18 (64%) had experienced chest pain and 22 (79%) breathlessness, compared to 14 (26%) and 26 (48%) of the 54 patients working (p < 0.01).
At one and five years following surgery, 18 and 19 patients respectively said that they had other physical problems or conditions which affected their physical or work activity. Again, there was a clear relation with working status; 13 (46%) of the 28 non-workers at five years said they had problems compared to six (12%) of the 54 workers (p < 0.001).
As might be expected there was a strong relation between presence of symptoms and restrictions in home, leisure, and social activities (p < 0.01) (table 3).
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN SYMPTOMS, ACTIVITY, AND NHP SCORES
The median scores of the “physical”’ dimensions of the NHP at five years after surgery (physical mobility, pain, and energy) were strongly related to both chest pain and dyspnoea, and to home, leisure, and social activities (p < 0.01). The lower the NHP score, in each of these dimensions, the more likely patients were to be free from symptoms and restrictions in activity. The median score for emotional reactions was significantly related to all these variables except chest pain (p < 0.01). The social isolation score was not significantly associated with symptoms but a lower score was strongly related to freedom from restrictions in home, leisure, and social activities (p < 0.01). Finally, problems with sleeping were not strongly associated with either chest pain (p = 0.07) or social life (p = 0.07), but were associated with breathlessness (p = 0.02) and restrictions in home and leisure pursuits (p = 0.005) (data available from the authors).
PREOPERATIVE PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME
Patients who were working before surgery were more likely to be working at both one and five years after surgery. Of the 46 patients who had worked in the six months before surgery, 33 (72%) were working at five years after surgery compared to 21 of 36 (58%) who had been out of work for longer than six months before surgery.
Patients who experienced dyspnoea before surgery, indicating more severely impaired left ventricular function, were more likely to be breathless and restricted in home, leisure, and social activities at both one and five years after surgery. At five years 17 of 32 patients (53%) free from breathlessness before surgery continued to be free from this symptom after surgery, compared to 16 of 51 patients (31%) with breathlessness before surgery (p = 0.05). In home activity, 26 of 29 patients (90%) free from breathlessness before surgery were free from restrictions in home activity at five years, compared to 28 of 48 (58%) with breathlessness before surgery (p = 0.04). In leisure and social activities, 24 of 31 patients (77%) and 26 of 30 patients (87%) free from breathlessness before surgery, were free from restrictions at five years after surgery, compared to 26 (52%) and 31 (62%) of 50 patients with breathlessness before surgery (p = 0.02).
Combining a generic measure of health status with disease or condition specific scales is the increasingly accepted minimum package in measuring health related quality of life. The generic measure will enable results to be set in context with other patient groups and/or general populations, and the specific scales will provide additional information relevant to the condition and treatment under scrutiny.4 ,5 In our study, the generic NHP picked up non-significant deterioration in the dimensions of physical mobility and energy at five years compared to one year after surgery. The NHP is noted for its insensitivity to differences in health status at the healthy end of the scale, as demonstrated by the high number of zero scores after treatment. The scales for symptom frequency and activity restrictions in the study questionnaire did identify significant changes. The use of multi-item scales in which each item has several levels of frequency or severity, is a much more effective way to measure change because such a method is much more likely to differentiate partial improvement, from nil or total improvement. We found strong associations particularly between the “physical” dimension scores of the NHP and the questionnaire scales. What we can conclude from these findings is that the study questionnaire added to the sensitivity of the results against a background of strong evidence of convergent validity with the NHP.
The other main report on health related quality of life at five years after CABG surgery is the US Veterans’ study in which patients were randomised to medical or surgical plus medical treatment.6All patients included in the trial were aged less than 70 years, had unstable angina, and bypass surgery was performed using the saphenous vein graft. The prevalence of chest pain following surgery was one of the few remaining significant differences between the groups at five years after entry to the trial. Of the 155 patients in the surgery group, 85 (55%) were free from chest pain at five years, compared to 52 of the 158 medical patients (33%). This compares well to the 60% (50 of 84) of our patients who were free from chest pain at five years.
The evidence of deterioration in physical health related quality of life, picked up by both the NHP and the study questionnaire, makes sense considering what is known regarding the patency of the saphenous vein graft.7 ,8 It also makes sense owing to the fact that patients were four years older than at one year follow up, with consequent restrictions because of aging. In our results at one year after surgery, the preoperative variables which were major factors influencing return to work and to unrestricted home activities were: working before operation; short waiting time; absence of breathlessness; and a low NHP physical mobility score.1Only absence of breathlessness before surgery, indicating relatively unimpaired left ventricular function, differentiated outcome at five years after surgery.
The use of the internal mammary artery is associated with excellent long term patency and improved early and late survival, with fewer myocardial infarctions and reoperations.9 ,10 It is also now widely accepted that the use of aspirin started soon after surgery and continuing long term reduces the graft occlusion rate.11 What do these changes mean for the results of this study? In the absence of formal measurement, one could suppose that if these improvements have affected health related quality of life, it will have been for the better. We can therefore surmise with some confidence that the combination of using the mammary artery and longer term use of aspirin, should produce a reduction in symptom frequency and severity and further delay the need for repeat surgery, extending the “seven year glitch” described by Petch.12
It is hoped that the results from this study will provide a valuable source of reference when measuring health related quality of life outcomes from new developments in revascularisation, including laser and minimally invasive surgical techniques.