OBJECTIVE To test the effect of a physician staffed advanced cardiac life support (ALS) system on patient outcome following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
DESIGN Observational study.
SETTING Two tier basic life support (BLS) and physician staffed ALS services in the midsized urban/suburban area of Heidelberg, Germany.
PATIENTS All patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology between January 1992 and December 1994 and who were covered by ALS services.
INTERVENTIONS Physician staffed ALS services.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Return of spontaneous circulation, hospital discharge, and one year survival, according to the Utstein style.
RESULTS Of 330 000 inhabitants, 755 suffered from cardiac arrest covered by the Heidelberg ALS services. In 512 patients, cardiopulmonary resuscitation had been initiated. Of 338 patients with cardiac aetiology, return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 164 patients (49%), 48 (14%) were discharged alive, and 40 (12%) were alive one year later; most of these patients showed good neurological outcome. Thus, 4.85 patients with cardiac aetiology were saved by the ALS services and discharged alive per 100 000 inhabitants a year. Ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia was detected in 106 patients (31%), other cardiac rhythms in 40 (12%), and asystole in 192 (57%). Hospital discharge rates (and one year survival) in these subgroups were 34.0% (29.2%), 12.5% (7.5%), and 3.6% (3.1%), respectively. Discharge rates increased if cardiac arrest was witnessed (bystander, 20.0%; BLS/ALS personnel, 21.4%; non-witnessed arrest, 3.3%; p < 0.01), and if the time period between the alarm and the arrival of the ALS unit was four minutes or less (⩽ 4 minutes, 30.6%; 4–8 minutes, 10.4%; > 8 minutes, 8.1%; p < 0.001). In 69 patients with bystander witnessed cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation, the discharge rate was 37.7%; 21 patients were alive after one year.
CONCLUSIONS A two tier BLS and physician staffed ALS system is associated with good long term outcome of patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology in a midsized urban/suburban area. Further studies, however, are required to assess whether having a physician in the ALS unit is an independent determinant for improved long term outcome.
- out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- emergency medical services
- long term outcome
- Utstein style
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Patient outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest depends on individual, demographic, sociological, and logistic factors.1-5 The availability, organisation, and personnel of the advanced cardiac life support (ALS) services is thought to be a crucial factor influencing the effectiveness of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).3 Nationwide physician staffed ALS services, however, are cost intensive and, therefore, still a matter of debate.
Despite the large amount of data focusing on outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, little information is available on the most effective organisation of emergency medical service systems.3 Indeed, a comparison of different emergency medical service systems had previously been rendered almost impossible by the lack of consensus and uniformity in basic data evaluation, with reported hospital discharge rates of patients ranging widely between 2% and 26%.3 One of the most important reasons for these major variations is the different terminology used for data evaluation.2 This problem led the Utstein consensus conference (involving the American Heart Association, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Australian Resuscitation Council, and the European Resuscitation Council) to establish uniform terms and recommendations for the evaluation and reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The results of this, the Utstein style, may for the first time allow a comparative analysis between different emergency medical service systems.6-8
We investigated the effects of using a two tier emergency medical service system consisting of basic emergency medical technician (EMT) units providing basic life support (BLS) and a physician staffed ALS unit on long term patient outcome. Therefore, data from patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were analysed according to the guidelines of the Utstein consensus conference.6-8
Patients and methods
PATIENTS AND SETTING
With institutional approval, all patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology between 1 January 1992 and 31 December 1994 (36 months) and who were covered by the Heidelberg ALS services were enrolled. The Heidelberg emergency medical service system serves the city of Heidelberg, a midsized urban community and its suburban environs with 21 communities, thereby covering a population of approximately 330 000 residents in a region of 430 square kilometres. At the time of the study, 48% of residents were male, and 14% of residents were aged 65 years or more.
During the study period, there were two components in the system, namely, the EMT ambulance crews, and one physician staffed ALS unit. Both components of this two tier system were equipped with separate vehicles and met at the scene of the arrest. The ALS unit consisted of one EMT and one physician, both based at the university hospital, who responded in a non-transport vehicle. All physicians were staff members of the departments of anaesthesiology and surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany, who had a minimum of two years' postgraduate clinical experience and had undergone special ALS training. EMT ambulances were manned with two EMT staff. The EMT personnel underwent a minimum of six months' education in emergency medicine including BLS training and defibrillation. All EMT-BLS units were equipped with a defibrillator, and the EMT personnel were allowed to defibrillate once if they had diagnosed ventricular fibrillation (VF) in a patient suffering from cardiac arrest. During the study, six EMT-BLS units were on duty in the daytime, while four served at night. Diagnosis of cardiac arrest and CPR were performed according to the current guidelines and recommendations of the American Heart Association9 and the European Resuscitation Council.10
All Heidelberg emergency medical services are dispatched by one centre with a central emergency telephone system. The centre dispatches about 60 000 medical calls annually, resulting in the transport of 52 000 patients to five receiving hospitals. During the study, the operator at the centre decided on the basis of formal protocols whether ALS services were required. Indications for dispatching ALS services were cardiac arrest, severe trauma, poisoning, traffic accidents involving children, and further severe, acute diseases. If ALS services were required, the closest available EMT-BLS unit and the physician staffed ALS unit were both dispatched simultaneously. If the EMT-BLS unit was the first vehicle to arrive on the scene, BLS was provided until the ALS unit arrived. Overall, the Heidelberg ALS unit is dispatched about 2000 times annually.
Using the Utstein template (fig 1),6-8 information was collected on: whether the arrest was witnessed and, if so, by whom (bystander or emergency medical service personnel); who initiated CPR (bystander, regardless of the quality of bystander CPR, or emergency medical service personnel); initial rhythm (VF, pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT), other cardiac rhythm, or asystole); whether there was a return of spontaneous circulation; and whether the patient survived to discharge and one year after discharge.6-8 To compare different emergency medical service systems, the Utstein style recommended the use of outcome data for patients whose cardiac arrest was witnessed by a bystander and who were found with VF of cardiac aetiology.6-8
All data were gathered using detailed protocols for data collection by the ALS physician in the prehospital setting, patient hospital records, and telephone interviews with the patient, the patient's relatives, and the patient's general practitioner. A presumed aetiology of cardiac arrest was determined from all available information including death certificates and necropsy reports. The outcome of all discharged patients was assessed according to the Glasgow-Pittsburgh outcome categories.6-8 ,11 ,12 Overall performance categories and cerebral performance categories (table1)6-8 ,11 ,12 were assessed before cardiac arrest, at hospital discharge, and one year later. Response time intervals—that is, the time intervals between the alarm and arrival of ALS on the scene—were taken from the computerised dispatch records. All data were recorded using 96 item data collection software with a closed question format. All data were double checked at data entry. Data analyses and telephone interviews were performed between July 1994 and January 1996. The primary end points of the study were death, discharge alive, alive at one year after discharge, and overall and cerebral performance categories6-8 ,11 ,12 at discharge and one year later.
DATA ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON WITH OTHER EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS
Frequencies were calculated using the total number of cardiac arrests of cardiac aetiology as the denominator. Data are expressed as mean (SD) if normally distributed (tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov algorithms); median with range was used if data were not normally distributed. Statistical analyses were performed usingt test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Scheffé test, Fisher's exact test, and χ2 test with Yates' correction, depending on the data configuration. Outcome data from the present study were compared with corresponding data obtained from other studies (only studies with data presentation according to the Utstein style were taken for this comparative analysis) by the χ2 test with Yates' correction. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Within the 36 month study period, 755 patients suffering from cardiac arrest were covered by the Heidelberg ALS services. In 243 of these patients, CPR was not attempted because death was confirmed by post mortem lividity and rigor mortis, or because cardiac arrest had obviously occurred after end stage malignant and other severe chronic diseases. In 512 patients, CPR was initiated (incidence of 51.7 CPR attempts per 100 000 per year). Non-cardiac aetiology was presumed in 129 patients; in 45 patients, no aetiology could be determined; 338 patients suffered from cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology (fig 1). None of these patients was excluded or lost to follow up. The mean age of this cohort was 67 (12) years; 70.1% of these patients were male and 29.9% were female (age 65 (12) years and 71 (12) years, respectively; p < 0.0001). Of 338 patients with an arrest of cardiac aetiology (100%), return of spontaneous circulation could be achieved in 164 (49%), 129 patients (38%) were admitted alive to a cardiac intensive care unit, 48 patients (14%) were discharged alive, and 40 patients (12%) were alive one year after discharge (fig 1). Thus, 4.85 lives of patients with cardiac aetiology were saved by the ALS services and discharged alive per 100 000 inhabitants a year. Most patients were in good condition at hospital discharge and one year later (table1).
The collapse was witnessed in 56% of cases by bystanders and in 8% of cases by emergency medical service personnel. Both of these subgroups had an increased survival rate (discharge rates, 20.0% and 21.4%, respectively) compared with patients suffering from unwitnessed cardiac arrest (discharge rate 3.3%, fig 2A). Overall, 102 (30%) patients were found with VF, four (1%) with VT, 40 (12%) with other cardiac rhythms, and 192 (57%) with asystole (fig 2B). Hospital discharge rates (and one year survival after discharge) amounted to 34.0% (29.2%) of patients with initial rhythm VF/VT, 12.5% (7.5%) of patients with other initial rhythms, and 3.6% (3.1%) of patients with asystole (fig 2B). Bystander CPR was initiated in 26% of patients, while CPR was initiated by emergency medical service personnel in 74% (52.2% of these by EMT, 47.8% by the ALS unit). Of all patients with bystander CPR, 19.3% survived to hospital discharge and 15.9% one year after discharge, while among those without bystander CPR, 12.4% survived to hospital discharge and 10.4% one year later (p = 0.09 one year after discharge; fig 2C). We observed a difference in the rate of VF (39.8% v26.8%; p < 0.05) and in sex between patients with (male 61.4%, female 38.6%) and those without (male 73.2%, female 26.8%; p = 0.05) bystander CPR. The collapse occurred in 61.8% of cases at home and in 38.2% outside the home (public places). Cardiac arrest was witnessed more often if it occurred in public places (79.8%v 55.0% at home; p < 0.05), and bystander CPR was initiated significantly more often in the case of cardiac arrest in a public place (35.5% v20.1% at home; p < 0.05). Patients who experienced their cardiac arrest in a public place showed significantly increased survival rates (fig 2D). The response time interval of the ALS unit was inversely related to long term outcome; an interval of four minutes or less was associated with a higher long term survival rate (fig 2E).
Overall, the mean response time interval for survivors (6.1 (4.0) minutes) was shorter than that for non-survivors (8.3 (4.0) minutes; p < 0.001). Increased age was associated with poorer prognosis (survivors, 62 (13) years, non-survivors 68 (12) years; p < 0.01) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit. With regard to the duration of CPR in these patients, there was no difference between long term survivors (20 (16) minutes) and non-survivors (21 (14) minutes). Nine patients were stabilised and survived after more than 30 minutes of CPR.
In patients whose cardiac arrest was witnessed by a bystander and who were found with VF of cardiac aetiology (n = 69; 6.97 patients per 100 000 inhabitants a year), the discharge rate was 37.7% (n = 26; 2.63 patients per 100 000 inhabitants a year) (fig 3); 21 (30.4%) of these patients were alive at one year. When comparing the present outcome data with those of other emergency medical service systems according to the Utstein recommendations, it was found that the present survival rates are close to those obtained from all other two and three tier BLS and physician staffed ALS services13-16 and to one ALS system with paramedics,17 all located in midsized urban/suburban areas (table 2). Emergency medical service systems in large metropolitan and rural areas without physician staffed ALS services revealed lower survival rates (table 2).5 ,18-26
In a midsized urban/suburban system with two tier BLS and ALS services, where ALS is provided by physicians, 14% of patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology were discharged alive, and 12% were alive at one year after discharge. Most of these patients showed good neurological outcome. Several factors influencing outcome could be identified. In the case of VF, survival increased if the cardiac arrest was witnessed, if it occurred in a public place, and/or if the time period between the alarm being raised and the arrival of the ALS unit was four minutes or less. All these factors reflect the time delay between cardiac arrest and initiation of CPR, and it is well known that early initiation of CPR is associated with a more favourable outcome.17 ,27 We also recognised the effect that age has on long term survival. Age, however, must not be an independent predictor of outcome, because age may be associated with a higher incidence of unfavourable pre-arrest health conditions.28 The rate of return of spontaneous circulation increased with bystander CPR. The lack of significant differences in survival at hospital discharge and one year after discharge, however, does not indicate that bystander CPR has no beneficial effects, since there was a notable trend towards improved long term outcome.
The present data are reported according to the recommendations of the Utstein consensus conference to allow comparison of our emergency medical service system with others.6-8 For this purpose, the Utstein consensus conference recommended the use of outcome data obtained from patients with bystander witnessed cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology and initial rhythm VF.6-8 In the present study, 37.7% of these patients were discharged alive, and 30.4% were alive one year after discharge. The comparative analysis revealed that survival rates in the present study are similar to those from other two tier BLS and physician staffed ALS service systems in midsized urban/suburban areas.13-16 The lowest survival rates could be observed in large metropolitan areas (table2).5 ,18 In large metropolitan areas and in rural communities, call−response intervals often exceeded 10 minutes,5 ,18 ,22 while in midsized urban/suburban areas, as in the present setting, BLS and ALS services are usually on the scene within 5–10 minutes.13-17 Moreover, subgroup analysis of survival among patients in whom cardiac arrest occurred after arrival of emergency medical service personnel (a setting where response time intervals could not affect outcome) suggests that factors such as race, socioeconomic status, substandard quality of health care for large groups of inhabitants, and lack of adequate bystander CPR may be the primary cause of higher cardiac arrest mortality in residents of larger cities and metropolitan areas than in individuals living in more suburban or rural settings.4 ,5
However, by reviewing studies on 39 emergency medical service programmes from 29 different locations published between 1967 and 1988, Eisenberg and colleagues showed that the qualification of the personnel and the configuration of the emergency medical service system are the most important independent variables affecting outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.3 The highest survival rates could be observed in two tier BLS and paramedic staffed ALS systems. Physician staffed ALS systems were not included in this comparative analysis because of a lack of data.3 One can speculate, however, that a physician has more experience in intubation of the trachea and immediate venous access than other emergency medical service personnel, and thus a physician staffed emergency medical service system may be superior.
The present analysis may support the view that physician staffed ALS systems are associated with higher survival rates in patients suffering from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology. All the data from physician staffed ALS systems, however, are related to midsized urban/suburban areas,13-16 while the available data from emergency medical service systems without a physician include a variety of regions, mostly large metropolitan and rural areas (table2).18-26 It cannot be sufficiently excluded by the present analysis that socioeconomic, demographic, and racial factors may cause the observed differences. Therefore, it remains unclear whether ALS training per se combined with the availability of a defibrillator or the presence of a physician on board the ALS unit makes the major difference with regard to the outcome of cardiac arrest.
In conclusion, the present data suggest that early initiation of CPR by bystanders and short response time intervals for physician staffed ALS units can reduce mortality in patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology. A two tier BLS and physician staffed ALS system is associated with good long term outcome in patients suffering from an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac aetiology in a midsized urban/suburban area. Further studies, however, are required to assess whether the fact that a physician is on board the ALS unit is an independent determinant for improved long term outcome.
This study was supported by a grant (No. 11/94) from the medical faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Germany, to Dr Böttiger. The authors would like to thank the emergency staff of the German Red Cross (Heidelberg), Professor C Herfarth, Dr J Stern, and A Thome (department of surgery, University of Heidelberg), Professor W Kübler (department of internal medicine, University of Heidelberg), and all colleagues involved in the Heidelberg out-of-hospital emergency medical services for their kind support. In addition, our thanks go to Dr M Fischer (department of anaesthesiology, University of Bonn, Germany) for helpful suggestions in data analysis.
This paper is dedicated to Professor R Juchems on the occasion of his 70th birthday