OBJECTIVE To assess whether the use of inverted lead aVR (−aVR) would improve the classification of acute inferior or lateral myocardial infarction presenting with ST elevation.
DESIGN Observational study. The presence of ⩾ 1 mm ST elevation in lead−aVR (derived by manual assessment of ST depression in conventional lead aVR) was determined by a single investigator, blinded to patient outcome.
PATIENTS 173 consecutive patients with chest pain for ⩽ 12 hours and ST elevation of ⩾ 1 mm in inferior leads (II, III, aVF) or lateral leads (I, aVL, V5, V6), excluding those with anterolateral ST elevation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Incidence of ST elevation in lead −aVR in patients with inferior or lateral ST elevation, or both.
RESULTS ST elevation in lead−aVR was present in 25 of 136 patients (18%) with inferior but no lateral ST elevation (indicating greater superior involvement) and in three of 11 patients (27%) with lateral but no inferior ST elevation (indicating greater inferior involvement). ST elevation in lead −aVR bridged the gap between inferior and lateral ST elevation in 15 of 25 (60%) patients with inferior and lateral chest lead (V5/V6) ST elevation, and in all patients with inferior and lateral limb lead (I/aVL) ST elevation. The presence of ST elevation in lead −aVR was associated with a larger infarct size as defined by median peak creatine kinase on serial sampling: 1780 v987 mmol/l; p = 0.021.
CONCLUSIONS Use of lead−aVR improves the ECG classification of acute inferior or lateral acute myocardial infarction and thus may be useful as part of the routine 12 lead ECG assessment of such patients.
- acute myocardial infarction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The conventional ECG samples body surface potentials from the horizontal axis in an orderly fashion from right to left across the body surface. Thus in a normal subject, an orderly progression in ECG waveform morphology—for example, R wave amplitude—is seen from lead V1 to V6. In contrast, the conventional ECG samples the frontal axis in a less orderly fashion (fig 1A) with a 60° gap between lead I and lead II, and a 90° gap between lead III and lead aVR. Furthermore, the conventional ECG displays first the bipolar leads (I, II, III) and then the unipolar leads (aVR, aVL, aVF), and thus no clear progression in waveform morphology is seen.
However, display of lead aVR (−150°) in inverted format as lead−aVR (+30°) bridges the gap between lead I (0°) and lead II (60°). Use of −aVRthus enables the frontal axis to be viewed in a logical ororderly display of 30° intervals from aVL (left superior) to lead III (right inferior).1 In patients with acute inferolateral myocardial infarction an orderly display illustrates the importance of −aVR as part of the sequential rise and fall in ST segment height as the leads circle the apex of the left ventricle (fig 1B).
Frontal lead aVR (−150°) is often neglected in ECG interpretation, with clinicians effectively using an “11 lead” ECG.2We hypothesised that display of lead aVR in inverted format (−aVR +30°), enabling it to be viewed as part of a sequential display of the frontal axis, would improve the classification of acute myocardial infarction presenting with ST elevation when it affected the frontal axis, that is, inferior or lateral myocardial infarction.
Patients were recruited consecutively over a 30 month period as they presented to a 24 hour physician-manned mobile coronary care unit (cardiac ambulance), the emergency department, or in a medical ward. Inclusion criteria were as follows:
onset of acute chest pain within the previous 12 hours;
ST elevation ⩾ 1 mm on the presenting 12 lead ECG in one or more inferior leads (II, III, aVF) or lateral leads (V5, V6, I, aVL);
the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction confirmed by a rise in creatine kinase of > 2× the upper normal laboratory reference level (with CK-MB isoenzyme activity ⩾ 7% if the aetiology of the total creatine kinase rise was equivocal), or a rise in creatine kinase of < 2× the upper laboratory normal reference level accompanied by serial ECG changes consistent with new myocardial infarction (new Q waves of ⩾ 0.03 seconds duration, or new persistent T wave inversion in two or more contiguous leads, or both).
Patients with anterolateral ST elevation (⩾ 1 mm ST elevation in lateral leads and one or more of leads V1–V4) were excluded. All patients had samples obtained for creatine kinase analysis at the time of admission, the following morning, and daily thereafter for three days.
The study was approved by the Queen's University of Belfast research ethics committee. All patients gave informed consent.
Standard distal limb lead placement was employed in all patients whether in the ambulance or in the hospital. Although adopted in Sweden for over 20 years,1 electronic inversion of lead aVR at the time of recording is not widely available elsewhere, and was not possible using our 12 lead ECG machines. Thus−aVR display (fig 1) was obtained by digital vertical inversion of a scanned image of conventional lead aVR (using Adobe Photoshop software) to aid ECG analysis of the frontal leads. However, to enable measurements to be made on the original ECG data, the presence of ⩾ 1 mm ST elevation (J point +80 ms) in lead−aVR was derived by manual assessment of ST depression in conventional lead aVR. ECGs were read by a single investigator, blinded to patient outcome, thereby minimising intraobserver bias and eliminating interobserver variability. All measurements were made using a Minnesota approved measuring loupe (6× EDSCORP pocket comparator) in order to reduce intraobserver error.
Baseline categorical variables were analysed by χ2test and continuous clinical variables by analysis of variance. The relation of ST elevation in lead −aVR to peak creatine kinase was assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test. In addition a multiple regression analysis was performed to control for the potential confounding influence of concurrent use of thrombolytic treatment or the presence of reciprocal anteroseptal ST depression. A value of p < 0.05 was taken as significant.
Over the study period, 173 patients were recruited. Of these, 136 patients had inferior ST elevation only, 11 had lateral ST elevation only, and 26 had both inferior and lateral ST elevation (which involved the lateral limb leads I or aVL in four of the 26 patients and the lateral chest leads V5 or V6 in 25 of the 26). ST elevation in−aVR was present in 44 of the 173 patients. Baseline characteristics are listed in table 1. Patients with and without ST elevation in −aVR were comparable, with no significant differences between sets with respect to baseline demographics, risk factors for ischaemic heart disease, and cardiac history, except for an excess of diabetes in those without ST elevation in −aVR.
INFERIOR WITHOUT LATERAL ST ELEVATION
In the 136 patients with ST elevation in the inferior leads but not in the lateral leads, 25 (18%) had ST elevation in lead−aVR, indicating a greater superior involvement of the acute myocardial infarction in the frontal plane than suggested by the conventional ECG display (fig 2, arrow A).
LATERAL WITHOUT INFERIOR ST ELEVATION
In the 11 patients with ST elevation in lateral leads (limb leads I, aVL, or chest leads V5 and V6) but not in inferior leads, three patients (27%) had ST elevation in lead−aVR, indicating a greater inferior involvement of the acute myocardial infarction in the frontal plane than suggested by the conventional ECG display (fig 2, arrows B and C).
INFERIOR AND LATERAL ST ELEVATION
Of the 26 patients with ST elevation in both inferiorand lateral leads, ST elevation in lead−aVR bridged the gap between inferior and lateral regions in 16 patients (62%). Of the 25 patients with ST elevation in inferior and lateral chest leads (V5 and V6), ST elevation in lead −aVR bridged the gap between inferior and lateral regions in 15 patients (60%). ST elevation in lead −aVR bridged the gap between inferior and lateral regions in all four patients with inferior and lateral limb lead ST elevation (leads I and aVL).
The presence of ST elevation ⩾ 1 mm in lead−aVR was associated with a larger infarct size as defined by median peak creatine kinase on serial sampling: 1780v 987 mmol/l; p = 0.021. The association of ST elevation in −aVR with higher peak creatine kinase was shown by multiple regression analysis to be independent of the use of thrombolytic treatment or the presence of reciprocal anteroseptal ST depression.
Our study has clearly shown the clinical value of assessing lead−aVR as part of the evaluation of the frontal axis in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting with inferior or lateral ST elevation. Previous studies have found lead−aVR to be useful in a variety of clinical settings. Anderson and colleagues have shown it to be valuable in assessing the extent of established Q waves,1 and incorporation of lead −aVR as part of an orderly display of the frontal axis can aid rapid calculation of axis angle.1 ,3 Viik and colleagues reported that ST depression in lead −aVR (as part of a lead set which also included leads I, V4, V5, and V6) was useful for differentiating between patients with coronary artery disease and those with a low likelihood of disease, using exercise stress testing.4Lead −aVR may be diagnostically helpful in heart rate adjusted ST segment (ST/HR) analysis during exercise stress testing.5 Gambill and colleagues have calculated the upper limit of normal T wave amplitude in lead−aVR with a view to incorporating it into automated ECG analysis in patients presenting with symptoms of acute transmural ischaemia.6
The failure to encourage universal adoption of the orderly ECG display of the frontal axis is most probably caused by the previous technical limitations of ECG recording systems, which have now been overcome by digital technology.1 The true display of lead−aVR (fig 1) is helpful for a general ECG assessment as it facilitates a sequential and logical interpretation of waveform morphology. Nevertheless, detection of the converse finding in conventional lead aVR (as used in this study), is a practical alternative method, particularly if only one variable is being sought.
IMPLICATIONS FOR REPERFUSION TREATMENT
Overall, patients with inferior or lateral myocardial infarction are thought to be at lower absolute risk than those with anterior myocardial infarction and derive a smaller relative risk reduction from thrombolytic treatment.7 Current practice thus tends towards use of streptokinase in patients with inferior myocardial infarction, whereas t-PA (tissue plasminogen activator) or, if available, primary angioplasty with or without stenting is increasingly being used for the “higher risk” anterior myocardial infarct patients.8 The use of serial creatine kinase sampling in our study was probably a suboptimal estimate of infarct size, and greater sampling frequency (for example, 4–6 hourly) to enable calculation of the area under the creatine kinase release curve may have been preferable. Nevertheless as patients with ST elevation in lead −aVR in our study were shown to have a higher median peak creatine kinase even after controlling for the use of thrombolytic treatment or the presence of reciprocal anteroseptal ST depression, they may represent a higher risk subgroup who should be assigned to an “optimum” reperfusion regimen.
Display of lead aVR in inverted format (−aVR) facilitates sequential evaluation of the frontal axis, improves the ECG classification of acute inferior or lateral acute myocardial infarction, and thus may be useful as part of the routine 12 lead ECG assessment of such patients.
IBAM was supported by a Royal Victoria Hospital clinical fellowship. We wish to thank research nurse Bernie Smith for her invaluable assistance.